These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38096856)

  • 1. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation.
    Gabriel EE; Sachs MC; Martinussen T; Waernbaum I; Goetghebeur E; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):534-547. PubMed ID: 38096856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust.
    Gabriel EE; Sachs MC; Waernbaum I; Goetghebeur E; Blanche PF; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A; Scheike T
    Biometrics; 2024 Jul; 80(3):. PubMed ID: 39036984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
    Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. G-computation and doubly robust standardisation for continuous-time data: A comparison with inverse probability weighting.
    Chatton A; Borgne FL; Leyrat C; Foucher Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Apr; 31(4):706-718. PubMed ID: 34861799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting and the Double Robustness Property.
    Kurz CF
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):156-167. PubMed ID: 34225519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Doubly robust estimation of the weighted average treatment effect for a target population.
    Tao Y; Fu H
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 30302780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An alternative empirical likelihood method in missing response problems and causal inference.
    Ren K; Drummond CA; Brewster PS; Haller ST; Tian J; Cooper CJ; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):5009-5028. PubMed ID: 27417265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating population treatment effects from a survey subsample.
    Rudolph KE; Díaz I; Rosenblum M; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 180(7):737-48. PubMed ID: 25190679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal inference for recurrent event data using pseudo-observations.
    Su CL; Platt RW; Plante JF
    Biostatistics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 32432686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.
    Funk MJ; Westreich D; Wiesen C; Stürmer T; Brookhart MA; Davidian M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):761-7. PubMed ID: 21385832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inverse probability weighting and doubly robust standardization in the relative survival framework.
    Syriopoulou E; Rutherford MJ; Lambert PC
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(27):6069-6092. PubMed ID: 34523751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators.
    Zivich PN; Breskin A
    Epidemiology; 2021 May; 32(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 33591058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity score weighting analysis and treatment effect discovery.
    Mao H; Li L; Greene T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2439-2454. PubMed ID: 29921162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple, doubly robust, efficient estimator for survival functions using pseudo observations.
    Wang J
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Feb; 17(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 29094501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.