139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38096874)
21. Corneal densitometry and biomechanical properties in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
Morales-Fernández L; Benito-Pascual B; Pérez-García P; Perucho-González L; Sáenz-Francés F; Santos-Bueso E; García-Bella J; Sánchez-Jean R; García-Feijoo J; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM
Can J Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 56(6):364-370. PubMed ID: 33577755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Novel dynamic corneal response parameters in a practice use: a critical review.
Jędzierowska M; Koprowski R
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Feb; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 30760270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Corneal biomechanical properties after soft contact lens wear measured on a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer: A before and after study.
Peyman A; Ghoreishi M; Hashemi-Estabragh SS; Mirmohammadkhani M; Mohammadinia M; Pourazizi M
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2021 Mar; 44(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 33618908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of the corneal biomechanics in pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and healthy controls using Corvis® Scheimpflug Technology.
Pradhan ZS; Deshmukh S; Dixit S; Gudetti P; Devi S; Webers CAB; Rao HL
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 68(5):787-792. PubMed ID: 32317447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Review of Corneal Biomechanics and Scleral Stiffness in Topical Prostaglandin Analog Therapy for Glaucoma.
Shen SR; Fleming GP; Jain SG; Roberts CJ
Curr Eye Res; 2023 Feb; 48(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 35929977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The short-term effects of wearing swimming goggles on corneal biomechanics.
Jiménez R; Molina R; Vera J; Redondo B
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 42(9):2773-2784. PubMed ID: 35378638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dynamic Scheimpflug Ocular Biomechanical Parameters in Healthy and Medically Controlled Glaucoma Eyes.
Miki A; Yasukura Y; Weinreb RN; Yamada T; Koh S; Asai T; Ikuno Y; Maeda N; Nishida K
J Glaucoma; 2019 Jul; 28(7):588-592. PubMed ID: 31107723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Scheimpflug-based tomography and biomechanical assessment in pressure-induced stromal keratopathy.
Faria-Correia F; Ramos I; Valbon B; Luz A; Roberts CJ; Ambrósio R
J Refract Surg; 2013 May; 29(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 23496019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.
Pedersen IB; Bak-Nielsen S; Vestergaard AH; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 252(8):1329-35. PubMed ID: 24862302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of Prostaglandin Analogues on Corneal Biomechanical Parameters Measured With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.
Yasukura Y; Miki A; Maeda N; Koh S; Nishida K
J Glaucoma; 2021 Nov; 30(11):996-1000. PubMed ID: 34086611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vivo characterization of corneal biomechanics.
Piñero DP; Alcón N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):870-87. PubMed ID: 24857436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Corneal biomechanics: a review.
Piñero DP; Alcón N
Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Mar; 98(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 25470213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Corneal Thickness After SMILE Affects Scheimpflug-based Dynamic Tonometry.
Fernández J; Rodríguez-Vallejo M; Martínez J; Tauste A; Piñero DP
J Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 32(12):821-828. PubMed ID: 27930792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection.
Ambrósio R; Lopes BT; Faria-Correia F; Salomão MQ; Bühren J; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P
J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Corneal Biomechanics in Subjects with Bilateral Keratoconus with Unilateral Vogt's Striae.
Askarizadeh F; Sedaghat MR; Ostadi-Moghaddam H; Narooie-Noori F; Rakhshandadi T; Rajabi S
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017; 6(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 29367935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. New parameters for evaluating corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after small-incision lenticule extraction by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.
Fernández J; Rodríguez-Vallejo M; Martínez J; Tauste A; Salvestrini P; Piñero DP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jun; 43(6):803-811. PubMed ID: 28732615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with Scheimpflug based device in healthy eyes and diseased ones.
Lanza M; Cennamo M; Iaccarino S; Irregolare C; Rechichi M; Bifani M; Gironi Carnevale UA
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():748671. PubMed ID: 25054144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
