188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38096984)
21. Generative adversarial network based digital stain conversion for generating RGB EVG stained image from hyperspectral H&E stained image.
Biswas T; Suzuki H; Ishikawa M; Kobayashi N; Obi T
J Biomed Opt; 2023 May; 28(5):056501. PubMed ID: 37265876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Association of Peritumoral Radiomics With Tumor Biology and Pathologic Response to Preoperative Targeted Therapy for HER2 (ERBB2)-Positive Breast Cancer.
Braman N; Prasanna P; Whitney J; Singh S; Beig N; Etesami M; Bates DDB; Gallagher K; Bloch BN; Vulchi M; Turk P; Bera K; Abraham J; Sikov WM; Somlo G; Harris LN; Gilmore H; Plecha D; Varadan V; Madabhushi A
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Apr; 2(4):e192561. PubMed ID: 31002322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Image Analysis of HER2 Immunohistochemical Staining of Surgical Breast Cancer Specimens.
Yim K; Park HS; Kim DM; Lee YS; Lee A
Yonsei Med J; 2019 Feb; 60(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 30666837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Do it the transformer way: A comprehensive review of brain and vision transformers for autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and classification.
Alharthi AG; Alzahrani SM
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107667. PubMed ID: 37939407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Tumor vascular invasion in breast carcinoma. Hematoxylin-eosin versus immunohistochemical staining for factor VIII antigen].
Obermair A; Czerwenka K; Kurz C; Kaider A; Sevelda P
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Nov; 119(44):1491-6. PubMed ID: 7525176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Slide drying after staining is the culprit of poor hematoxylin-eosin staining].
Liu Y; Lu SF; Zhou H; Chan JK
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 42(4):271-2. PubMed ID: 23928538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Microdissection and molecular genetic analysis of HER2/neu in breast carcinoma.
Youngson BJ; Anelli A; Van Zee KJ; Borgen PI; Norton L; Rosen PP
Am J Surg Pathol; 1995 Dec; 19(12):1354-8. PubMed ID: 7503357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. BUViTNet: Breast Ultrasound Detection via Vision Transformers.
Ayana G; Choe SW
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36359497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CORRELATION BETWEEN CLINICAL PATHOLOGY OF LUMINAL B BREAST CANCER AND DETERMINATION OF ESTROGEN RECEPTOR, PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR AND HER2 EXPRESSION COMBINED WITH NUCLEAR MORPHOLOGY.
Yin D; Wang YL; Wang YF; Yang L; Zhang L; Tang C; Xie W; Ma Y
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2015; 29(3):579-87. PubMed ID: 26403396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. D2-40 in breast cancer: should we detect more vascular emboli?
de Mascarel I; MacGrogan G; Debled M; Sierankowski G; Brouste V; Mathoulin-Pélissier S; Mauriac L
Mod Pathol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 18820667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An Effective Video Transformer With Synchronized Spatiotemporal and Spatial Self-Attention for Action Recognition.
Alfasly S; Chui CK; Jiang Q; Lu J; Xu C
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2024 Feb; 35(2):2496-2509. PubMed ID: 35857731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transformer-based Deep Neural Network for Breast Cancer Classification on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
Lee W; Lee H; Lee H; Park EK; Nam H; Kooi T
Radiol Artif Intell; 2023 May; 5(3):e220159. PubMed ID: 37293346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic value of endothelial markers and HHV-8 staining in gastrointestinal Kaposi sarcoma and its difference in endoscopic tumor staging.
Nagata N; Igari T; Shimbo T; Sekine K; Akiyama J; Hamada Y; Yazaki H; Ohmagari N; Teruya K; Oka S; Uemura N
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 19(23):3608-14. PubMed ID: 23801862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spatial transcriptomics prediction from histology jointly through Transformer and graph neural networks.
Zeng Y; Wei Z; Yu W; Yin R; Yuan Y; Li B; Tang Z; Lu Y; Yang Y
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35849101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer-aided prognosis on breast cancer with hematoxylin and eosin histopathology images: A review.
Chen JM; Li Y; Xu J; Gong L; Wang LW; Liu WL; Liu J
Tumour Biol; 2017 Mar; 39(3):1010428317694550. PubMed ID: 28347240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Data-Efficient Computational Pathology Platform for Faster and Cheaper Breast Cancer Subtype Identifications: Development of a Deep Learning Model.
Bae K; Jeon YS; Hwangbo Y; Yoo CW; Han N; Feng M
JMIR Cancer; 2023 Sep; 9():e45547. PubMed ID: 37669090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative nuclear histomorphometry predicts oncotype DX risk categories for early stage ER+ breast cancer.
Whitney J; Corredor G; Janowczyk A; Ganesan S; Doyle S; Tomaszewski J; Feldman M; Gilmore H; Madabhushi A
BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):610. PubMed ID: 29848291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accurate preoperative staging and HER2 status prediction of gastric cancer by the deep learning system based on enhanced computed tomography.
Guan X; Lu N; Zhang J
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():950185. PubMed ID: 36452488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CAM-VT: A Weakly supervised cervical cancer nest image identification approach using conjugated attention mechanism and visual transformer.
Fan Z; Wu X; Li C; Chen H; Liu W; Zheng Y; Chen J; Li X; Sun H; Jiang T; Grzegorzek M; Li C
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Aug; 162():107070. PubMed ID: 37295389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predicting the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer patients by fusing pathological whole slide images and clinical features using multiple instance learning.
Wang Y; Zhang L; Li Y; Wu F; Cao S; Ye F
Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Apr; 20(6):11196-11211. PubMed ID: 37322978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
