These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38097424)

  • 1. Deep learning-based automated detection of the dental crown finish line: An accuracy study.
    Choi J; Ahn J; Park JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38097424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of finish line location and saliva contamination on the accuracy of crown finish line scanning.
    An H; Mickesh GJ; Cho D; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan; 33(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 36719010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
    Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
    Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of the impact of various finish line designs and occlusal morphologies on the accuracy of digital impressions.
    Gunel A; Guncu MB; Uzel SM; Aktas G; Arikan H; Reiss N; Turkyilmaz I
    J Dent Sci; 2023 Jul; 18(3):1264-1271. PubMed ID: 37404659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of finish line locations of tooth preparation on the accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Son K; Lee KB
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 34006061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
    Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Ayad MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An In Vitro Comparison of Zirconia and Hybrid Ceramic Crowns With Heavy Chamfer and Shoulder Finish Lines.
    Yadav P; Sharma V; Paliwal J; Meena KK; Madaan R; Gurjar B
    Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33940. PubMed ID: 36819334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of automatic finish line detection for tooth preparation in dental computer-aided software.
    Mai HN; Han JS; Kim HS; Park YS; Park JM; Lee DH
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jan; 67(1):138-143. PubMed ID: 35569999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of CAD/CAM Digital Impressions with Different Intraoral Scanner Parameters.
    Chiu A; Chen YW; Hayashi J; Sadr A
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32093174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transferring the tooth preparation finish line on intraoral digital scans to dental software programs: A dental technique.
    Cabanes-Gumbau G; Palma JC; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):439-443. PubMed ID: 34998579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy.
    Borbola D; Berkei G; Simon B; Romanszky L; Sersli G; DeFee M; Renne W; Mangano F; Vag J
    J Dent; 2023 Feb; 129():104391. PubMed ID: 36549570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. User experience of and satisfaction with computer-aided design software when designing dental prostheses: A multicenter survey study.
    Win TT; Mai HN; Rana S; Kim HS; Pae A; Hong SJ; Lee Y; Lee DH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2024 Jul; 0(0):0. PubMed ID: 39011633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing.
    Wesemann C; Muallah J; Mah J; Bumann A
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27834416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of marginal defects on the accuracy of automated finish line detection in tooth preparation.
    Park JH; Lee DH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Nov; 26(4):311-317. PubMed ID: 36749284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrepancies in the occlusal devices designed by an experienced dental laboratory technician and by 2 artificial intelligence-based automatic programs.
    Kois JC; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Gómez-Polo M; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37798183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11404758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atraumatic intraoral scans and virtual hybrid casts for custom implant abutments and zirconia implants: Accuracy of the workflow.
    Schubert O; Edelhoff D; Schweiger J; Güth JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):920-929. PubMed ID: 34598772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.