164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38098053)
1. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetries in Caucasian adult patients with different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. A cone beam study using 3D segmentation and mirroring procedures.
España-Pamplona P; Zamora-Martinez N; Tarazona-Álvarez B; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Paredes-Gallardo V
Head Face Med; 2023 Dec; 19(1):54. PubMed ID: 38098053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D quantification of mandibular asymmetry using the SPHARM-PDM tool box.
Alhadidi A; Cevidanes LH; Paniagua B; Cook R; Festy F; Tyndall D
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Mar; 7(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 22089896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Lemes CR; Tozzi CF; Gribel S; Gribel BF; Venezian GC; do Carmo Menezes C; Custodio W
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Feb; 43(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 32965519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
Sanders DA; Chandhoke TK; Uribe FA; Rigali PH; Nanda R
Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 24935152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Asymmetries in Adult Patients With Different Skeletal Classes and Vertical Patterns: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Mendoza LV; Bellot-Arcís C; Montiel-Company JM; García-Sanz V; Almerich-Silla JM; Paredes-Gallardo V
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12319. PubMed ID: 30120301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Craniofacial features affecting mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class II patients.
Thiesen G; Gribel BF; Freitas MPM; Oliver DR; Kim KB
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):437-445. PubMed ID: 28667433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional evaluation of craniofacial characteristics related to mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class I patients.
Thiesen G; Freitas MPM; Araújo EA; Gribel BF; Kim KB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 29957327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of condylar asymmetry in different skeletal patterns with cone-beam CT].
Li WY; Chen WJ; Hou W; Qin JW; Duan YF; Mu JQ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Oct; 28(5):523-528. PubMed ID: 32274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Congenital and acquired mandibular asymmetry: Mapping growth and remodeling in 3 dimensions.
Solem RC; Ruellas A; Ricks-Oddie JL; Kelly K; Oberoi S; Lee J; Miller A; Cevidanes L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):238-51. PubMed ID: 27476356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Li J; Liu Y; Ge X; Liu Z; Guan H; Wang L; Ma W
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):4973-4985. PubMed ID: 37417986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular vertical asymmetry in adult orthodontic patients with different vertical growth patterns: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Celik S; Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE
Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 26065465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillofacial Features Related to Mandibular Asymmetries in Skeletal Class III Patients.
Thiesen G; Gribel BF; Kim KB; Freitas MPM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 75(5):1015-1025. PubMed ID: 28012844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated assessment of mandibular shape asymmetry in 3-dimensions.
Fan Y; Zhang Y; Chen G; He W; Song G; Matthews H; Claes P; Pei Y; Zha H; Penington A; Kilpatrick N; Schneider P; Jiang R; Xu T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 May; 161(5):698-707. PubMed ID: 35473835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography.
Minich CM; Araújo EA; Behrents RG; Buschang PH; Tanaka OM; Kim KB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23810046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography.
Cevidanes LH; Alhadidi A; Paniagua B; Styner M; Ludlow J; Mol A; Turvey T; Proffit WR; Rossouw PE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jun; 111(6):757-70. PubMed ID: 21497527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular functional units in adult patients with unilateral posterior crossbite:
Leonardi R; Muraglie S; Bennici O; Cavallini C; Spampinato C
Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):590-596. PubMed ID: 31013132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-Dimensional Changes in the Mandibular Proximal Segment After Using a Surgery-First Approach in Patients With Class III Malocclusion and Facial Asymmetry.
Kim M; Jha N; Choi JH; Kim YJ; Lee U; Cevidanes L; Choi JY; Baek SH
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1956-1961. PubMed ID: 35175981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D analysis of condylar remodelling and skeletal relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
Xi T; Schreurs R; van Loon B; de Koning M; Bergé S; Hoppenreijs T; Maal T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 25779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
