These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38098121)

  • 1. Orthodontic treatment and biological limits: a retrospective clinical trial.
    Tabancis NN; Krey KF; Stahl F; Behnke V; Ratzmann A
    Head Face Med; 2023 Dec; 19(1):53. PubMed ID: 38098121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.
    Keles A; Sayinsu K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10629518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of sagittal and vertical dental changes during first phase of orthodontic treatment with MBT vs ROTH prescription.
    Talapaneni AK; Supraja G; Prasad M; Kommi PB
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 22945707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of WALA ridge and dental arch dimensions changes after orthodontic treatment using a passive self-ligating system or conventional fixed appliance.
    Esteves T; Salvatore Freitas KM; Vaz de Lima D; Cotrin P; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; De Freitas MR; Gobbi de Oliveira RC
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31397413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
    Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular arch changes following nonextraction treatment.
    Waring DT; Pender N; Counihan D
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 Nov; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16429866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined therapy with pendulum and lingual arch appliances in the early mixed dentition.
    Kinzinger G; Fritz U; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2003 May; 64(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 12835892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
    Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 8670927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
    Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
    Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class III correction using an inter-arch spring-loaded module.
    Vanlaecken R; Williams MO; Razmus T; Gunel E; Martin C; Ngan P
    Prog Orthod; 2014 May; 15(1):32. PubMed ID: 24934153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An active, skeletally anchored transpalatal appliance for derotation, distalization and vertical control of maxillary first molars.
    Hourfar J; Ludwig B; Kanavakis G
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S24-32. PubMed ID: 25138362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.