164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38098240)
21. Evaluation of the post-processing algorithms SimGrid and S-Enhance for paediatric intensive care patients and neonates.
Krueger PC; Ebeling K; Waginger M; Glutig K; Scheithauer M; Schlattmann P; Proquitté H; Mentzel HJ
Pediatr Radiol; 2022 May; 52(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 35192022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effectiveness of flexible noise control image processing for digital portal images using computed radiography.
Yamada S; Murase K
Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):519-27. PubMed ID: 15900057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of Virtual Grid Processed Clinical Chest Radiographs.
Gossye T; Buytaert D; Smeets PV; Morbée L; De Wilde C; Vermeiren K; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2022 Sep; 57(9):585-591. PubMed ID: 35438670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing the Effect of Packing the Sulcus on Image Quality in Equine Digital Radiography.
Rowan C; Puggioni A; Hoey SE; O'Leary JM; Kearney C; Connolly SE; Skelly C
Vet Rec; 2019 Feb; 184(7):221. PubMed ID: 30711918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of flat-panel digital to conventional film-screen radiography in detection of experimentally created lesions of the equine third metacarpal bone.
Moorman VJ; Marshall JF; Devine DV; Payton M; Jann HW; Bahr R
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(6):577-83. PubMed ID: 19999339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can advanced edge enhancement software improve image quality to visualise tubes, catheters and wires in digital chest radiographs?
Kristensen SV; Outzen C; Grau LM; Larsen TR; Bidstrup M; Egeskjold MV; Knude JA; Juhl D; Precht H
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jan; 29(1):165-170. PubMed ID: 36395686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cone-beam computed tomography produces images of numerically comparable diagnostic quality for bone and inferior quality for soft tissues compared with fan-beam computed tomography in cadaveric equine metacarpophalangeal joints.
Stewart HL; Siewerdsen JH; Selberg KT; Bills KW; Kawcak CE
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2023 Nov; 64(6):1033-1036. PubMed ID: 37947254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Post-processing image filtration enabling dose reduction in standard abdominal CT.
Leander P; Söderberg M; Fält T; Gunnarsson M; Albertsson I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20207748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of equine cheek teeth and adjacent structures: comparative study of image quality in horses in vivo, post-mortem and frozen-thawed.
Röttiger C; Hellige M; Ohnesorge B; Bienert-Zeit A
Acta Vet Scand; 2019 Dec; 61(1):62. PubMed ID: 31823831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard- and reduced-dose CT.
Yanagawa M; Honda O; Yoshida S; Kikuyama A; Inoue A; Sumikawa H; Koyama M; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1259-66. PubMed ID: 20634106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.
Warren LM; Mackenzie A; Cooke J; Given-Wilson RM; Wallis MG; Chakraborty DP; Dance DR; Bosmans H; Young KC
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3202-13. PubMed ID: 22755704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
Smet MH; Breysem L; Mussen E; Bosmans H; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Image quality and radiation dose reduction in chest CT in pulmonary infection.
Cristofaro M; Busi Rizzi E; Piselli P; Pianura E; Petrone A; Fusco N; Di Stefano F; Schinina' V
Radiol Med; 2020 May; 125(5):451-460. PubMed ID: 32048157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
Gruber M; Uffmann M; Weber M; Prokop M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C
Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1544-50. PubMed ID: 16404566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiation dose considerations in digital radiography with an anti-scatter grid: A study using adult and pediatric phantoms.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Kitao A; Matsubara T; Sugiura T; Kobayashi T; Kobayashi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 24(9):e14081. PubMed ID: 37491809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality using 16-row CT.
Gurung J; Khan MF; Maataoui A; Herzog C; Bux R; Bratzke H; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15806366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
