These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38098839)

  • 1. Estimation and inference on high-dimensional individualized treatment rule in observational data using split-and-pooled de-correlated score.
    Liang M; Choi YG; Ning Y; Smith MA; Zhao YQ
    J Mach Learn Res; 2022; 23():. PubMed ID: 38098839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
    van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
    Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved doubly robust estimation in learning optimal individualized treatment rules.
    Pan Y; Zhao YQ
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2021; 116(533):283-294. PubMed ID: 34024961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient augmentation and relaxation learning for individualized treatment rules using observational data.
    Zhao YQ; Laber EB; Ning Y; Saha S; Sands BE
    J Mach Learn Res; 2019; 20():. PubMed ID: 31440118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doubly Robust Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment with Censored Data.
    Zhao YQ; Zeng D; Laber EB; Song R; Yuan M; Kosorok MR
    Biometrika; 2015 Mar; 102(1):151-168. PubMed ID: 25937641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL LONGITUDINAL DATA.
    Fang EX; Ning Y; Li R
    Ann Stat; 2020 Oct; 48(5):2622-2645. PubMed ID: 34267407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
    Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Targeted learning ensembles for optimal individualized treatment rules with time-to-event outcomes.
    Díaz I; Savenkov O; Ballman K
    Biometrika; 2018 Sep; 105(3):723-738. PubMed ID: 30799874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative contrast estimation and inference for treatment recommendation.
    Liang M; Yu M
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):2920-2932. PubMed ID: 36645310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resampling-based confidence intervals for model-free robust inference on optimal treatment regimes.
    Wu Y; Wang L
    Biometrics; 2021 Jun; 77(2):465-476. PubMed ID: 32687215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doubly robust tests of exposure effects under high-dimensional confounding.
    Dukes O; Avagyan V; Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2020 Dec; 76(4):1190-1200. PubMed ID: 32002989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scalable collaborative targeted learning for high-dimensional data.
    Ju C; Gruber S; Lendle SD; Chambaz A; Franklin JM; Wyss R; Schneeweiss S; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):532-554. PubMed ID: 28936917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved inference for doubly robust estimators of heterogeneous treatment effects.
    Shin H; Antonelli J
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3140-3152. PubMed ID: 36745745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.
    van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(1):29-57. PubMed ID: 24516006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of propensity score methods for causal inference with high-dimensional covariates.
    Gao Q; Zhang Y; Sun H; Wang T
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jul; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 35667004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation and Optimization of Composite Outcomes.
    Luckett DJ; Laber EB; Kim S; Kosorok MR
    J Mach Learn Res; 2021 Jan; 22():. PubMed ID: 34733120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal Structural Models with Counterfactual Effect Modifiers.
    Zheng W; Luo Z; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2018 Jun; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29883322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication-efficient estimation and inference for high-dimensional quantile regression based on smoothed decorrelated score.
    Di F; Wang L; Lian H
    Stat Med; 2022 Nov; 41(25):5084-5101. PubMed ID: 36263919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robust inference on the average treatment effect using the outcome highly adaptive lasso.
    Ju C; Benkeser D; van der Laan MJ
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 31350906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.