These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38098931)

  • 41. Organ Donation on the Internet: Quality and Readability in English.
    Yazar MA; Kozanhan B
    Transplant Proc; 2021; 53(6):1777-1783. PubMed ID: 34243964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Readability of online material related to skin cancer.
    Basch CH; Fera J; Ethan D; Garcia P; Perin D; Basch CE
    Public Health; 2018 Oct; 163():137-140. PubMed ID: 30149263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Testicular Cancer on the Web-an Appropriate Source of Patient Information in Concordance with the European Association of Urology Guidelines?
    Paffenholz P; Salem J; Borgmann H; Nestler T; Pfister D; Ruf C; Tsaur I; Haferkamp A; Heidenreich A
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Dec; 33(6):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 28776306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Readability of online patient education materials for Merkel cell carcinoma.
    Zhang Y; Nguyen CC; Bilimoria KY; Merkow RP
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2023 Apr; 315(3):629-632. PubMed ID: 35976406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Readability, understandability, and quality of retinopathy of prematurity information on the web.
    Yılmaz FH; Tutar MS; Arslan D; Çeri A
    Birth Defects Res; 2021 Jul; 113(12):901-910. PubMed ID: 33594835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Analysis of Trustworthiness and Readability of English and Spanish Hypo- and Hyperthyroid-Related Online Patient Education Information.
    Parikh C; Ostrovsky AM
    J Patient Exp; 2023; 10():23743735231179063. PubMed ID: 37323756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Higher readability of institutional websites drives the correct fruition of the abortion pathway: A cross-sectional study.
    Ferrari A; Pirrotta L; Bonciani M; Venturi G; Vainieri M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277342. PubMed ID: 36331935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on periodontal disease.
    Al-Ak'hali MS; Fageeh HN; Halboub E; Alhajj MN; Ariffin Z
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Feb; 21(1):41. PubMed ID: 33541345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
    San Giorgi MRM; de Groot OSD; Dikkers FG
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Oct; 127(10):2293-2297. PubMed ID: 28233911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
    Yilmaz Hanci S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Readability Comparison of Pro- and Anti-Cancer Screening Online Messages in Japan.
    Okuhara Ts; Ishikawa H; Okada M; Kato M; Kiuchi T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016 Dec; 17(12):5237-5242. PubMed ID: 28125867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for aphasia.
    Azios JH; Bellon-Harn M; Dockens AL; Manchaiah V
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Feb; 21(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28805470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Quality and readability of online information on myofascial pain syndrome.
    Bagcier F; Yurdakul OV; Temel MH
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2021 Jan; 25():61-66. PubMed ID: 33714513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A readability comparison of anti- versus pro-influenza vaccination online messages in Japan.
    Okuhara T; Ishikawa H; Okada M; Kato M; Kiuchi T
    Prev Med Rep; 2017 Jun; 6():47-52. PubMed ID: 28271020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality and Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Information on Common Prosthodontic Treatments.
    Alshehri A; Alghofaili N; ALshunaiber R; Alkadi L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):62–67. PubMed ID: 33651024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Improving access to COVID-19 information by ensuring the readability of government websites.
    Serry T; Stebbins T; Martchenko A; Araujo N; McCarthy B
    Health Promot J Austr; 2023 Apr; 34(2):595-602. PubMed ID: 35535619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.