These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38099206)

  • 1. Shared emotions, interpersonal syntonization, and group decision-making: a multi-agent perspective.
    Crivelli D; Balconi M
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1251855. PubMed ID: 38099206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinct inter-brain synchronization patterns underlying group decision-making under uncertainty with partners in different interpersonal relationships.
    Zhao H; Zhang C; Tao R; Duan H; Xu S
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 272():120043. PubMed ID: 37003448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Your happy expressions encourage me to take risks: ERP evidence from an interpersonal gambling game.
    Yuan H; Zheng T; Chang Y; Luo Y; Chen X
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Nov; 166():108205. PubMed ID: 34653548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotions as Social Information in Shared Decision-Making in Oncology.
    Treffers T; Putora PM
    Oncology; 2020; 98(6):430-437. PubMed ID: 31901906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "I'm listening, did it make any difference to your negative emotions?" Evidence from hyperscanning.
    Wang S; Lu J; Yu M; Wang X; Shangguan C
    Neurosci Lett; 2022 Sep; 788():136865. PubMed ID: 36067901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Studies on syntonization voltage. 2. Mechanisms for development of syntonization voltage.
    YOSHII N; SAITO I
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1957 Sep; 11(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 13562280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emotional Regulation Self-Efficacy Influences Moral Decision Making: A Non-Cooperative Game Study of the New Generation of Employees.
    Liu B; Yang T; Xie W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36498436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.
    Tates K; Antheunis ML; Kanters S; Nieboer TE; Gerritse MB
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Dec; 19(12):e421. PubMed ID: 29263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social risky decision-making reveals gender differences in the TPJ: A hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
    Zhang M; Liu T; Pelowski M; Jia H; Yu D
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Dec; 119():54-63. PubMed ID: 28889923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpersonal problems and recognition of facial emotions in healthy individuals.
    Suslow T; Lemster A; Koelkebeck K; Kersting A
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1139051. PubMed ID: 37139331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pseudo-hyperscanning shows common neural activity during face-to-face communication of affect to be associated with shared affective feelings but not with mere emotion recognition.
    Anders S; Verrel J; Haynes JD; Ethofer T
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():210-220. PubMed ID: 32916419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opportunities for theory-informed decision science in cancer control.
    Gillman AS; Ferrer RA
    Transl Behav Med; 2021 Nov; 11(11):2055-2064. PubMed ID: 34850928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation context in interactive decision making.
    Hu Y; Pan Y; Shi X; Cai Q; Li X; Cheng X
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Mar; 133():54-62. PubMed ID: 29292232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reading people's minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making.
    de Melo CM; Carnevale PJ; Read SJ; Gratch J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Jan; 106(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 24079297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pervasive influence of idiosyncratic associative biases during facial emotion recognition.
    El Zein M; Wyart V; Grèzes J
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8804. PubMed ID: 29891849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Majority Decision-Making Works Best Under Conditions of Leadership Ambiguity and Shared Task Representations.
    Schippers MC; Rus DC
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():519295. PubMed ID: 34194351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpersonal emotion regulation strategy choice in younger and older adults.
    Gurera JW; Wolfe HE; Murry MWE; Isaacowitz DM
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Jun; 36(4):643-659. PubMed ID: 35373700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond the technical: The role of emotion regulation in lacrosse officiating.
    Friesen AP; Devonport TJ; Lane AM
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Mar; 35(6):579-586. PubMed ID: 27148769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cooperation and Competition with Hyperscanning Methods: Review and Future Application to Emotion Domain.
    Balconi M; Vanutelli ME
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2017; 11():86. PubMed ID: 29033810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The neural dynamics underlying the interpersonal effects of emotional expression on decision making.
    Chen X; Zheng T; Han L; Chang Y; Luo Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():46651. PubMed ID: 28425491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.