BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38100293)

  • 1. FRAGSITE2: A structure and fragment-based approach for virtual ligand screening.
    Zhou H; Skolnick J
    Protein Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):e4869. PubMed ID: 38100293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FRAGSITE: A Fragment-Based Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening.
    Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Apr; 61(4):2074-2089. PubMed ID: 33724022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of the Morgan Fingerprint in Structure-Based Virtual Ligand Screening.
    Zhou H; Skolnick J
    J Phys Chem B; 2024 Jun; 128(22):5363-5370. PubMed ID: 38783525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FINDSITE
    Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2343-2354. PubMed ID: 30278128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FINDSITE(comb): a threading/structure-based, proteomic-scale virtual ligand screening approach.
    Zhou H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):230-40. PubMed ID: 23240691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PoLi: A Virtual Screening Pipeline Based on Template Pocket and Ligand Similarity.
    Roy A; Srinivasan B; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1757-70. PubMed ID: 26225536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FINDSITE: a threading-based approach to ligand homology modeling.
    Brylinski M; Skolnick J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000405. PubMed ID: 19503616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LIGSIFT: an open-source tool for ligand structural alignment and virtual screening.
    Roy A; Skolnick J
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 25336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SPOT-Ligand: Fast and effective structure-based virtual screening by binding homology search according to ligand and receptor similarity.
    Yang Y; Zhan J; Zhou Y
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Jul; 37(18):1734-9. PubMed ID: 27074979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ligand-based virtual screening approach using a new scoring function.
    Hamza A; Wei NN; Zhan CG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):963-74. PubMed ID: 22486340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SCORCH: Improving structure-based virtual screening with machine learning classifiers, data augmentation, and uncertainty estimation.
    McGibbon M; Money-Kyrle S; Blay V; Houston DR
    J Adv Res; 2023 Apr; 46():135-147. PubMed ID: 35901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.
    Hsieh JH; Yin S; Wang XS; Liu S; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 22017385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FINDSITE(X): a structure-based, small molecule virtual screening approach with application to all identified human GPCRs.
    Zhou H; Skolnick J
    Mol Pharm; 2012 Jun; 9(6):1775-84. PubMed ID: 22574683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)-based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening.
    Spiegel J; Senderowitz H
    Mol Inform; 2022 Nov; 41(11):e2200034. PubMed ID: 35790469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening.
    Ebejer JP; Finn PW; Wong WK; Deane CM; Morris GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2600-2616. PubMed ID: 31117509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.
    Wu Y; Brooks CL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Nov; 61(11):5535-5549. PubMed ID: 34704754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.