113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38102010)
1. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Conventional Ultrasound Characteristics of Breast Cancer With Different Molecular Subtypes.
Li X; Zhang J; Zhang G; Liu J; Tang C; Chen K; Chen P; Tan L; Guo Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Apr; 24(3):204-214. PubMed ID: 38102010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association Between Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.
Wen B; Kong W; Zhang Y; Xue H; Wu M; Wang F
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2019-2031. PubMed ID: 34837655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adding contrast-enhanced ultrasound markers to conventional axillary ultrasound improves specificity for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer.
Du LW; Liu HL; Gong HY; Ling LJ; Wang S; Li CY; Zong M
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20200874. PubMed ID: 32976019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities.
Park AY; Kwon M; Woo OH; Cho KR; Park EK; Cha SH; Song SE; Lee JH; Cha J; Son GS; Seo BK
Korean J Radiol; 2019 May; 20(5):759-772. PubMed ID: 30993927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Qualitative, quantitative and combination score systems in differential diagnosis of breast lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Wang Y; Fan W; Zhao S; Zhang K; Zhang L; Zhang P; Ma R
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 26724648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic and prognostic values of contrast‑enhanced ultrasound combined with diffusion‑weighted magnetic resonance imaging in different subtypes of breast cancer.
Liu GF; Wang ZQ; Zhang SH; Li XF; Liu L; Miao YY; Yu SN
Int J Mol Med; 2018 Jul; 42(1):105-114. PubMed ID: 29620140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.
Liang X; Li Z; Zhang L; Wang D; Tian J
Ultrason Imaging; 2020 Nov; 42(6):261-270. PubMed ID: 33019918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in breast ductal abnormalities.
Wang B; Yang D; Zhang X; Gong X; Xu T; Han J; Ren Y; Zou S; Li L; Wang Y
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Mar; 23(1):25. PubMed ID: 36899406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the preoperative prediction of pathological characteristics in breast cancer.
Li LL; Su QL; Deng YX; Guo WW; Lun HM; Hu Q
Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1320714. PubMed ID: 38487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
Yuan Y; Xu M; Ren Y; He L; Chen J; Sun L
Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():2017026. PubMed ID: 36105240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pilot trial to evaluate the clinical usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting renal outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury.
Yoon HE; Kim DW; Kim D; Kim Y; Shin SJ; Shin YR
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235130. PubMed ID: 32579595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative proteomics revealed novel proteins associated with molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Suman S; Basak T; Gupta P; Mishra S; Kumar V; Sengupta S; Shukla Y
J Proteomics; 2016 Oct; 148():183-93. PubMed ID: 27498393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3-5 lesions.
Janu E; Krikavova L; Little J; Dvorak K; Brancikova D; Jandakova E; Pavlik T; Kovalcikova P; Kazda T; Valek V
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32552678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging features of breast cancer subtypes on contrast enhanced ultrasound: a feasibility study.
Chandola S; Dhamija E; Paul SB; Hari S; Batra A; Mathur S; Deo SVS
Ecancermedicalscience; 2023; 17():1619. PubMed ID: 38414960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Findings and Differential Diagnosis of Hepatic Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma Compared with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Huang Z; Wu X; Li S; Li K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1403-1411. PubMed ID: 32165015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of 127 Cases.
Li W; Zhou Q; Xia S; Wu Y; Fei X; Wang Y; Tao L; Fan J; Zhou W
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jan; 39(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 31206200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: The Role of Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Jia Y; Zhu Y; Li T; Song X; Duan Y; Yang D; Nie F
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(3):623-634. PubMed ID: 35866231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The kinetic quantitative characteristics of non-mass breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a prospective study.
Cai YY; Du YC; Zhao L; Hu WJ; Bai Y; Chen A; Du LF; Li F
Br J Radiol; 2023 Dec; 96(1152):20221002. PubMed ID: 37660395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Value of Qualitative and Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Pathological Subtypes of Small Solid Renal Masses.
He M; Gao Q; Xiang J; Mao Q; Jiang T
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Aug; 42(8):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 36591796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
