These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3810301)
1. Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. I. Restriction of gross body motions. Lantz SA; Schultz AB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986 Oct; 11(8):834-7. PubMed ID: 3810301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. II. Effect on trunk muscle myoelectric activity. Lantz SA; Schultz AB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986 Oct; 11(8):838-42. PubMed ID: 3810302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of motion restriction and trunk stiffness provided by three thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSOs). Cholewicki J; Alvi K; Silfies SP; Bartolomei J J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Oct; 16(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 14526195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization: Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System. Lang G; Hirschmüller A; Patermann S; Eichelberger P; Strohm P; Baur H; Südkamp NP; Herget GW World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e128-e146. PubMed ID: 29729467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of three different types of orthoses on the range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living. Jegede KA; Miller CP; Bible JE; Whang PG; Grauer JN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):2346-53. PubMed ID: 21358469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lumbar spine stabilization with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis: evaluation with video fluoroscopy. Vander Kooi D; Abad G; Basford JR; Maus TP; Yaszemski MJ; Kaufman KR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14699284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Video fluoroscopic analysis of the effects of three commonly-prescribed off-the-shelf orthoses on vertebral motion. Utter A; Anderson ML; Cunniff JG; Kaufman KR; Jelsing EJ; Patrick TA; Magnuson DJ; Maus TP; Yaszemski MJ; Basford JR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(12):E525-9. PubMed ID: 20445478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stabilization of 2-column thoracolumbar fractures with orthoses: a cadaver model. Rubery PT; Brown R; Prasarn M; Small J; Conrad B; Horodyski M; Rechtine G Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):E270-5. PubMed ID: 23211532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional spinal motion measurements. Part 2: A noninvasive assessment of lumbar brace immobilization of the spine. Buchalter D; Kahanovitz N; Viola K; Dorsky S; Nordin M J Spinal Disord; 1988; 1(4):284-6. PubMed ID: 2980256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of lumbar orthosis on intervertebral mobility. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Axelsson P; Johnsson R; Strömqvist B Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 Jun; 17(6):678-81. PubMed ID: 1626301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of 2 different thoracolumbar orthoses on the stability of the spine during various body movements. Kienle A; Saidi S; Oberst M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):E1082-9. PubMed ID: 23644685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three lumbar orthoses using motion assessment during task performance. Krag MH; Fox MS J; Haugh LD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2359-67. PubMed ID: 14560084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of three types of lumbar orthosis for restricting extension motion. Terai T; Yamada H; Asano K; Nawata A; Iwasaki T; Henmi T; Sairyo K Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Jul; 24 Suppl 1():S239-43. PubMed ID: 24728780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An update on orthotic devices for the lumbar spine based on a review of the literature. Calmels P; Fayolle-Minon I Rev Rhum Engl Ed; 1996 Apr; 63(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 8738448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Movement Restriction of Spinal Orthoses Using Inertial Measurement Units. Fercho J; Krakowiak M; Yuser R; Szmuda T; Zieliński P; Szarek D; Pettersson SD; Miękisiak G Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of thoracolumbosacral orthosis on spinal deformities, trunk asymmetry, and frontal lower rib cage in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Korovessis P; Kyrkos C; Piperos G; Soucacos PN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(16):2064-71. PubMed ID: 10954637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses. Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of a trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force on low-back load in elderly persons during static standing. Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Yasui T; Iijima S; Ito A Clin Interv Aging; 2015; 10():1413-20. PubMed ID: 26366062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical effectiveness studies of lumbar spine orthoses. Nachemson A; Schultz A; Andersson G Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1983; 9():139-49. PubMed ID: 6232699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lower spinal mobility and external immobilization in the normal and pathologic condition. Miller RA; Hardcastle P; Renwick SE Orthop Rev; 1992 Jun; 21(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 1614722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]