These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38104395)

  • 1. Reliability of ordinal outcomes in forensic black-box studies.
    Arora HM; Kaplan-Damary N; Stern HS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jan; 354():111909. PubMed ID: 38104395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions.
    Austin Hicklin R; McVicker BC; Parks C; LeMay J; Richetelli N; Smith M; Buscaglia J; Perlman RS; Peters EM; Eckenrode BA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Oct; 339():111418. PubMed ID: 35987091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and reproducibility of forensic tire examination decisions.
    Richetelli N; LeMay J; Dunagan KM; Parks CL; Hicklin RA; Chapman WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 May; 358():112009. PubMed ID: 38581823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110457. PubMed ID: 33239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study on factors that affect error rates in handwriting examinations of Korean characters by forensic document examiners and non-experts.
    Kang TY; Kim H; Yook S; Lee J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111266. PubMed ID: 35278787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners.
    Dror IE; Scherr KC; Mohammed LA; MacLean CL; Cunningham L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110610. PubMed ID: 33358191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners.
    Monson KL; Smith ED; Peters EM
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Sep; 68(5):1721-1740. PubMed ID: 37393551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method for quantifying individual decision thresholds of latent print examiners.
    Luby A
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2023; 7():100340. PubMed ID: 37448982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical Bayesian non-response models for error rates in forensic black-box studies.
    Khan K; Carriquiry A
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2023 May; 381(2247):20220157. PubMed ID: 36970820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reliability of forensic handwriting comparisons.
    Hicklin RA; Eisenhart L; Richetelli N; Miller MD; Belcastro P; Burkes TM; Parks CL; Smith MA; Buscaglia J; Peters EM; Perlman RS; Abonamah JV; Eckenrode BA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(32):e2119944119. PubMed ID: 35914157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finding the perfect match: Fingerprint expertise facilitates statistical learning and visual comparison decision-making.
    Growns B; Mattijssen EJAT; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Cole SA; Martire KA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Jun; 29(2):386-397. PubMed ID: 35404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Firearm examination: Examiner judgments and computer-based comparisons.
    Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Zheng XA; Soons JA; Stoel RD
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jan; 66(1):96-111. PubMed ID: 32970858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners.
    Monson KL; Smith ED; Peters EM
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jan; 68(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 36183147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bayesian approach for the analysis of error rate studies in forensic science.
    Hendricks JH; Neumann C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110047. PubMed ID: 31821943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.