These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners. Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions. Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study. Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110457. PubMed ID: 33239260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A study on factors that affect error rates in handwriting examinations of Korean characters by forensic document examiners and non-experts. Kang TY; Kim H; Yook S; Lee J Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111266. PubMed ID: 35278787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners. Dror IE; Scherr KC; Mohammed LA; MacLean CL; Cunningham L Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110610. PubMed ID: 33358191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners. Monson KL; Smith ED; Peters EM J Forensic Sci; 2023 Sep; 68(5):1721-1740. PubMed ID: 37393551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for quantifying individual decision thresholds of latent print examiners. Luby A Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2023; 7():100340. PubMed ID: 37448982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions? Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hierarchical Bayesian non-response models for error rates in forensic black-box studies. Khan K; Carriquiry A Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2023 May; 381(2247):20220157. PubMed ID: 36970820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence. Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]