These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38104614)

  • 1. Fluency, prediction and motivation: how processing dynamics, expectations and epistemic goals shape aesthetic judgements.
    Yoo J; Jasko K; Winkielman P
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 379(1895):20230326. PubMed ID: 38104614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: the pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking.
    Graf LK; Landwehr JR
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):395-410. PubMed ID: 25742990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?
    Reber R; Schwarz N; Winkielman P
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2004; 8(4):364-82. PubMed ID: 15582859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Order and change in art: towards an active inference account of aesthetic experience.
    Van de Cruys S; Frascaroli J; Friston K
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 379(1895):20220411. PubMed ID: 38104600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The aesthetic valve: how aesthetic appreciation may switch emotional states from anxiety to curiosity.
    Barbieri P; Sarasso P; Lodico F; Aliverti A; Murayama K; Sacco K; Ronga I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 379(1895):20220413. PubMed ID: 38104608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parallelisms and deviations: two fundamentals of an aesthetics of poetic diction.
    Menninghaus W; Wagner V; Schindler I; Knoop CA; Blohm S; Frieler K; Scharinger M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 379(1895):20220424. PubMed ID: 38104607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling individual aesthetic judgements over time.
    Brielmann AA; Berentelg M; Dayan P
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 379(1895):20220414. PubMed ID: 38104603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the Subjective Feeling of Fluency.
    Forster M; Leder H; Ansorge U
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jan; 63(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 27025534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of crossmodal predictions on the neural processing of aesthetic stimuli.
    Tiihonen M; Haumann NT; Shtyrov Y; Vuust P; Jacobsen T; Brattico E
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 379(1895):20220418. PubMed ID: 38104610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking.
    Graf LK; Landwehr JR
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():15. PubMed ID: 28194119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When Challenging Art Gets Liked: Evidences for a Dual Preference Formation Process for Fluent and Non-Fluent Portraits.
    Belke B; Leder H; Carbon CC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0131796. PubMed ID: 26309095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faces in-between: evaluations reflect the interplay of facial features and task-dependent fluency.
    Winkielman P; Olszanowski M; Gola M
    Emotion; 2015 Apr; 15(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 25642724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Fluency Amplification Model: fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations.
    Albrecht S; Carbon CC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():195-203. PubMed ID: 24603044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The urge to judge: Why the judgmental attitude has anything to do with the aesthetic enjoyment of negative emotions.
    Brattico E; Vuust P
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e353. PubMed ID: 29342780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Being alive to the world: an artist's perspective on predictive processing.
    Pepperell R
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 379(1895):20220429. PubMed ID: 38104609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed matters: fluency impacts trust ratings when faces range on valence but not on motivational implications.
    Olszanowski M; Kaminska OK; Winkielman P
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1032-1051. PubMed ID: 29057707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motivation and prediction-driven processing of social memoranda.
    Reggev N
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2024 Apr; 159():105613. PubMed ID: 38437974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterizing the emotional response to art beyond pleasure: Correspondence between the emotional characteristics of artworks and viewers' emotional responses.
    Tinio PPL; Gartus A
    Prog Brain Res; 2018; 237():319-342. PubMed ID: 29779742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool.
    Schindler I; Hosoya G; Menninghaus W; Beermann U; Wagner V; Eid M; Scherer KR
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178899. PubMed ID: 28582467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It felt fluent but I did not like it: fluency effects in faces versus patterns.
    Gerger G; Forster M; Leder H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):637-648. PubMed ID: 26821596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.