These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38105862)

  • 21. The relative position of the greater palatine foramen in dry Indian skulls.
    Saralaya V; Nayak SR
    Singapore Med J; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1143-6. PubMed ID: 18043845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of pterygomaxillary anatomy using computed tomography: are there any structural variations in cleft patients?
    Lee SH; Lee SH; Mori Y; Minami K; Park HS; Kwon TG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Oct; 69(10):2644-9. PubMed ID: 21496989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Lefort I Osteotomy Line and Pterygomaxillary Junction Region in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Sancar B; Duman ŞB
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Aug; 58(8):951-956. PubMed ID: 33143439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical anatomy of the posterior maxilla pertaining to Le Fort I osteotomy in Thais.
    Apinhasmit W; Chompoopong S; Methathrathip D; Sangvichien S; Karuwanarint S
    Clin Anat; 2005 Jul; 18(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 15971227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determining the anatomy of the descending palatine artery and pterygoid plates with computed tomography in Class III patients.
    Ueki K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Okabe K; Yamamoto E
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 37(8):469-73. PubMed ID: 19427795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of treatment outcome and stability between distraction osteogenesis and LeFort I osteotomy in cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia.
    Baek SH; Lee JK; Lee JH; Kim MJ; Kim JR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 18(5):1209-15. PubMed ID: 17912117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variations of the location of the greater palatine foramina in dry human skulls.
    Sujatha N; Manjunath KY; Balasubramanyam V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 16454323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Morphometric study of the greater palatine canal: cone-beam computed tomography.
    Rapado-González O; Suárez-Quintanilla JA; Otero-Cepeda XL; Fernández-Alonso A; Suárez-Cunqueiro MM
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2015 Dec; 37(10):1217-24. PubMed ID: 26104277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anatomical variation in the position of the greater palatine foramen.
    Chrcanovic BR; Custódio AL
    J Oral Sci; 2010 Mar; 52(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 20339241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
    Kuroda S; Murakami K; Morishige Y; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ultrasound-guided greater palatine nerve block: a case series of anatomical descriptions and clinical evaluations.
    Sahar Hafeez N; Sondekoppam RV; Ganapathy S; Armstrong JE; Shimizu M; Johnson M; Merrifield P; Galil KA
    Anesth Analg; 2014 Sep; 119(3):726-730. PubMed ID: 24977913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of maxillary advancement on maxillary incisor display in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and cleft lip and palate.
    Bajracharya M; Wang YC; Huang CS; Bhandari K; Sinha S; Wen-Ching Ko E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Dec; 162(6):898-906. PubMed ID: 36117029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anatomical characteristics of greater palatine foramen: a novel point of view.
    Gibelli D; Borlando A; Dolci C; Pucciarelli V; Cattaneo C; Sforza C
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2017 Dec; 39(12):1359-1368. PubMed ID: 28752360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Palatal bone thickness at the implantation area of maxillary skeletal expander in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Chen W; Zhang K; Liu D
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33752663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anatomic basis of Le Fort 1 impaction osteotomy: a radiological study.
    Bendrihem R; Vacher C; Fohlen A; Pelage JP
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1209-1214. PubMed ID: 28528359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of a LeFort I maxillary osteotomy.
    Semaan S; Goonewardene MS
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):964-73. PubMed ID: 16448239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical Modifications Specific to the Cleft Le Fort I Osteotomy.
    Susarla SM; Ettinger R; Preston K; Hitesh Kapadia ; Egbert MA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(5):1459-1463. PubMed ID: 32282690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modification of LeFort I Osteotomy for Correction of Severe Maxillary Cant Associated With Fibrous Dysplasia.
    Anehosur V; Acharya P; Suresh A; Kumar N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 May; 34(3):e206-e208. PubMed ID: 35984047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of palatal mucosal thickness and location of the greater palatine foramen using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study.
    Oduncuoğlu BF; Karslioğlu H; Karasu IN; Nisanci Yilmaz MN; Inonu E
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 39(4):784-791. PubMed ID: 37584816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.