These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38106549)

  • 1. Development and material characteristics of glaucoma surgical implants.
    Qin Q; Zhang C; Yu N; Jia F; Liu X; Zhang Q; Chen M; Wang K
    Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res; 2023; 3(4):171-179. PubMed ID: 38106549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Review of the Literature.
    Balas M; Mathew DJ
    Vision (Basel); 2023 Aug; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 37606500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aqueous shunts for glaucoma.
    Tseng VL; Coleman AL; Chang MY; Caprioli J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD004918. PubMed ID: 28750481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implantable drainage devices in glaucoma: Quo vadis?
    Yadav KS; Sharma S
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2019 May; 133():1-7. PubMed ID: 30877069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational and Experimental Analysis of an In Vitro Microfluidic Experimental Setup on Testing Molteno, Ahmed Valve and Ex-Press Implants and Their Critical Comparisons.
    Kara E; Turhan S; Kutlar Aİ; Güngör K
    Curr Eye Res; 2022 Jan; 47(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 34252337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Critical Appraisal of the Literature.
    Mathew DJ; Buys YM
    Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2020 Sep; 6():47-89. PubMed ID: 32936738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS): a review of surgical procedures using stents.
    Pillunat LE; Erb C; Jünemann AG; Kimmich F
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():1583-1600. PubMed ID: 28919702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The New Era of Glaucoma Micro-stent Surgery.
    Manasses DT; Au L
    Ophthalmol Ther; 2016 Dec; 5(2):135-146. PubMed ID: 27314234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Choice of Drainage Device in Complicated Glaucomas: Comparing Ahmed and Baerveldt Implants.
    Moschos MM; Nitoda E; Gouliopoulos N; Damaskos C; Laios K; Bagkli E; Garmpis N; Kitsos G
    In Vivo; 2019; 33(3):911-916. PubMed ID: 31028216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control and optimisation of fluid flow in glaucoma drainage device surgery.
    Lim KS
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Feb; 32(2):230-234. PubMed ID: 29350692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glaucoma drainage devices: a review of the past, present, and future.
    Patel S; Pasquale LR
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):265-70. PubMed ID: 21091010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New concepts for glaucoma implants--controlled aqueous humor drainage, encapsulation prevention and local drug delivery.
    Schmidt W; Kastner C; Sternberg K; Allemann R; Löbler M; Guthoff R; Schmitz KP
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2013; 14(1):98-111. PubMed ID: 23092262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: a comprehensive review of current options and future directions.
    Pereira ICF; van de Wijdeven R; Wyss HM; Beckers HJM; den Toonder JMJ
    Eye (Lond); 2021 Dec; 35(12):3202-3221. PubMed ID: 34127842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The surgical management of glaucoma: A review.
    Lim R
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 50(2):213-231. PubMed ID: 35037376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of glaucoma drainage implants].
    Mercieca K
    Ophthalmologie; 2023 Apr; 120(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 37115285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Glaucoma drainage implants].
    Reinthal EK; Rohrbach JM; Grisanti S
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2010 Jan; 227(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20091451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. XEN-augmented Baerveldt surgical success rate and comparison with the Ahmed Valve.
    Teixeira FJ; Sousa DC; Machado NM; Caiado F; Barão R; Sens P; Abegão Pinto L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 98(7):e870-e875. PubMed ID: 32187846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glaucoma drainage implants: a critical comparison of types.
    Schwartz KS; Lee RK; Gedde SJ
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 16552254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro and in vivo flow characteristics of glaucoma drainage implants.
    Prata JA; Mérmoud A; LaBree L; Minckler DS
    Ophthalmology; 1995 Jun; 102(6):894-904. PubMed ID: 7777296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Update on Implants for Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS).
    Ansari E
    Ophthalmol Ther; 2017 Dec; 6(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 28730285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.