These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38108583)

  • 1. Could bulk fill glass hybrid restorative materials replace composite resins in treating permanent teeth? A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Uyumaz FÜ; Abaklı İnci M; Özer H
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):702-709. PubMed ID: 38108583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management of severity lesions of hypomineralized molars (MIH) with different treatment alternatives: 9-month results of a clinical trial.
    Ozsoy M; Erken Gungor O
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 May; 48(3):68-75. PubMed ID: 38755984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study.
    Miletić I; Baraba A; Krmek SJ; Perić T; Marković D; Basso M; Ozkaya CA; Kemaloglu H; Turkun LS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jan; 28(1):104. PubMed ID: 38243032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of thermo-viscous and sonic fill-activated bulk fill composite restorations.
    Morsy KE; Salama MM; Genaid TM
    Am J Dent; 2023 Apr; 36(2):81-85. PubMed ID: 37076297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):E32-E42. PubMed ID: 31738696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative in non-carious cervical lesions of patients with bruxism: a split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.
    Koc Vural U; Meral E; Ergin E; Gürgan S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1229-1238. PubMed ID: 31297658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sixty-month comperative evaluation of a glass hybrid restorative and a composite resin in non-carious cervical lesions of bruxist individuals.
    Koc Vural U; Meral E; Ergin E; Gurgan S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar; 28(3):207. PubMed ID: 38459231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Nanocoats on the Physicomechanical Properties and Microleakage of Bulk-fill and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements: An
    Habib SI; Yassen AA; Bayoumi RE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 34002711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance of short fiber reinforced composite and glass hybrid on hypomineralized molars: A 36-month randomized split-mouth study.
    Sen Yavuz B; Kaya R; Kodaman Dokumacigil N; Ozgur EG; Bekiroglu N; Kargul B
    J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104919. PubMed ID: 38431187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparison of different glass ionomer-based restoratives and a bulk-fill resin composite in Class I cavities: A 48-month randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
    Bayazıt EÖ; Başeren M; Meral E
    J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104473. PubMed ID: 36863696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-year evaluation of a nano-hybrid and a bulk-fill resin composite: a randomized, double-blind split-mouth clinical study.
    Çağırır Dindaroğlu F; Yılmaz E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar; 28(4):208. PubMed ID: 38467942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system.
    Gurgan S; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Oztas SS; Cakir FY
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 25299703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-vitro evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth restored with different high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative materials and bulk-fill composite resins.
    Nezir M; Ozcan S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):345. PubMed ID: 38809289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children.
    Akman H; Tosun G
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 32246655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative systems in small class II restorations.
    Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; El-Negoly SAE; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Apr; 35(3):538-555. PubMed ID: 36564970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Evaluation of Microhybrid Composite and Glass lonomer Restorative Material in Permanent Teeth.
    Kharma K; Zogheib T; Bhandi S; Mehanna C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Feb; 19(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29422475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.
    Heintze SD; Loguercio AD; Hanzen TA; Reis A; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e109-e135. PubMed ID: 35221127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation.
    Gurgan S; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Oztas SS; Cakir FY
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2335-2343. PubMed ID: 28000039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.