These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38110247)

  • 1. Engineering Proteins Using Statistical Models of Coevolutionary Sequence Information.
    Dinan JC; McCormick JW; Reynolds KA
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2024 Apr; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 38110247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct coevolutionary couplings reflect biophysical residue interactions in proteins.
    Coucke A; Uguzzoni G; Oteri F; Cocco S; Monasson R; Weigt M
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Nov; 145(17):174102. PubMed ID: 27825220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coevolution-based inference of amino acid interactions underlying protein function.
    Salinas VH; Ranganathan R
    Elife; 2018 Jul; 7():. PubMed ID: 30024376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constructing sequence-dependent protein models using coevolutionary information.
    Cheng RR; Raghunathan M; Noel JK; Onuchic JN
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 26223372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amino acid positions subject to multiple coevolutionary constraints can be robustly identified by their eigenvector network centrality scores.
    Parente DJ; Ray JC; Swint-Kruse L
    Proteins; 2015 Dec; 83(12):2293-306. PubMed ID: 26503808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families.
    Morcos F; Pagnani A; Lunt B; Bertolino A; Marks DS; Sander C; Zecchina R; Onuchic JN; Hwa T; Weigt M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Dec; 108(49):E1293-301. PubMed ID: 22106262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Undersampling and the inference of coevolution in proteins.
    Kleeorin Y; Russ WP; Rivoire O; Ranganathan R
    Cell Syst; 2023 Mar; 14(3):210-219.e7. PubMed ID: 36693377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequence coevolution between RNA and protein characterized by mutual information between residue triplets.
    Brandman R; Brandman Y; Pande VS
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30022. PubMed ID: 22279560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlated positions in protein evolution and engineering.
    Franceus J; Verhaeghe T; Desmet T
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 May; 44(4-5):687-695. PubMed ID: 27514664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous identification of specifically interacting paralogs and interprotein contacts by direct coupling analysis.
    Gueudré T; Baldassi C; Zamparo M; Weigt M; Pagnani A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Oct; 113(43):12186-12191. PubMed ID: 27729520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PPalign: optimal alignment of Potts models representing proteins with direct coupling information.
    Talibart H; Coste F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):317. PubMed ID: 34112081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conservation of coevolving protein interfaces bridges prokaryote-eukaryote homologies in the twilight zone.
    Rodriguez-Rivas J; Marsili S; Juan D; Valencia A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Dec; 113(52):15018-15023. PubMed ID: 27965389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing the false positive rate in the non-parametric analysis of molecular coevolution.
    Codoñer FM; O'Dea S; Fares MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Apr; 8():106. PubMed ID: 18402697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How Pairwise Coevolutionary Models Capture the Collective Residue Variability in Proteins?
    Figliuzzi M; Barrat-Charlaix P; Weigt M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Apr; 35(4):1018-1027. PubMed ID: 29351669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era.
    Kamisetty H; Ovchinnikov S; Baker D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Sep; 110(39):15674-9. PubMed ID: 24009338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coevolutionary Signals and Structure-Based Models for the Prediction of Protein Native Conformations.
    Dos Santos RN; Jiang X; Martínez L; Morcos F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1851():83-103. PubMed ID: 30298393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elements of coevolution in biological sequences.
    Rivoire O
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Apr; 110(17):178102. PubMed ID: 23679784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aligning biological sequences by exploiting residue conservation and coevolution.
    Muntoni AP; Pagnani A; Weigt M; Zamponi F
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Dec; 102(6-1):062409. PubMed ID: 33465950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rosetta design with co-evolutionary information retains protein function.
    Schmitz S; Ertelt M; Merkl R; Meiler J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1008568. PubMed ID: 33465067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein structure prediction: making AWSEM AWSEM-ER by adding evolutionary restraints.
    Sirovetz BJ; Schafer NP; Wolynes PG
    Proteins; 2017 Nov; 85(11):2127-2142. PubMed ID: 28799172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.