These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38110725)

  • 21. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A matrix-based method of moments for fitting multivariate network meta-analysis models with multiple outcomes and random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Bujkiewicz S; Law M; Riley RD; White IR
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):548-556. PubMed ID: 28806485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta-analyses.
    Jackson D; White IR; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1282-97. PubMed ID: 19408255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the Q statistic with constant weights for standardized mean difference.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):444-465. PubMed ID: 35094381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian estimation in random effects meta-analysis using a non-informative prior.
    Bodnar O; Link A; Arendacká B; Possolo A; Elster C
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):378-399. PubMed ID: 27790722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of a Matrix of Heterogeneity Parameters in Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Random-Effects Models.
    Wouhib A
    J Stat Theory Appl; 2014 Mar; 13(1):46-64. PubMed ID: 33574736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Approximate confidence intervals for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis.
    Jackson D; Bowden J; Baker R
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 26287958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of statistical inferences from the DerSimonian-Laird and alternative random-effects model meta-analyses - an empirical assessment of 920 Cochrane primary outcome meta-analyses.
    Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Awad T; Thabane L; Gluud C
    Res Synth Methods; 2011 Dec; 2(4):238-53. PubMed ID: 26061888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing Heterogeneity in Random-Effects Meta-analysis.
    Langan D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2345():67-89. PubMed ID: 34550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved Fisher z estimators for univariate random-effects meta-analysis of correlations.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):233-61. PubMed ID: 18257972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modified Liu estimators in the linear regression model: An application to Tobacco data.
    Babar I; Ayed H; Chand S; Suhail M; Khan YA; Marzouki R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259991. PubMed ID: 34807916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform network meta-analyses with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Law M; Barrett JK; Turner R; Higgins JP; Salanti G; White IR
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):819-39. PubMed ID: 26423209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta-analyses.
    Huang H
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 May; 14(3):526-543. PubMed ID: 36916486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.
    Noma H; Maruo K; Gosho M; Levine SZ; Goldberg Y; Leucht S; Furukawa TA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30764757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.