These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38111126)

  • 1. An evolutionary algorithm for the direct optimization of covariate balance between nonrandomized populations.
    Privitera S; Sedghamiz H; Hartenstein A; Vaitsiakhovich T; Kleinjung F
    Pharm Stat; 2024; 23(3):288-307. PubMed ID: 38111126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic score-based model averaging approach for propensity score estimation.
    Kabata D; Stuart EA; Shintani A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Oct; 24(1):228. PubMed ID: 39363252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indirect covariate balance and residual confounding: An applied comparison of propensity score matching and cardinality matching.
    Fortin SP; Schuemie M
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2022 Dec; 31(12):1242-1252. PubMed ID: 35811396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects.
    Franklin JM; Rassen JA; Ackermann D; Bartels DB; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(10):1685-99. PubMed ID: 24323618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic matching for time-dependent treatments: a longitudinal extension and simulation study.
    Weymann D; Chan B; Regier DA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 37559105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28454568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A matching method for improving covariate balance in cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Sekhon JS; Grieve RD
    Health Econ; 2012 Jun; 21(6):695-714. PubMed ID: 21633989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for estimating subgroup effects in cost-effectiveness analyses that use observational data.
    Kreif N; Grieve R; Radice R; Sadique Z; Ramsahai R; Sekhon JS
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(6):750-63. PubMed ID: 22691446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Stuart EA; Lee BK; Leacy FP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. PubMed ID: 23849158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched propensity score analyses.
    Kuss O
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 23972521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of subset matching methods and forms of covariate balance.
    de Los Angeles Resa M; Zubizarreta JR
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):4961-4979. PubMed ID: 27442072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Balance Super Learner: A robust adaptation of the Super Learner to improve estimation of the average treatment effect in the treated based on propensity score matching.
    Pirracchio R; Carone M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2504-2518. PubMed ID: 28339317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of the matching algorithm on the treatment effect estimate: A neutral comparison study.
    Heinz P; Wendel-Garcia PD; Held U
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2100292. PubMed ID: 35385172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matching by propensity score in cohort studies with three treatment groups.
    Rassen JA; Shelat AA; Franklin JM; Glynn RJ; Solomon DH; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2013 May; 24(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 23532053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving propensity score estimators' robustness to model misspecification using super learner.
    Pirracchio R; Petersen ML; van der Laan M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 181(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 25515168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Claims-based studies of oral glucose-lowering medications can achieve balance in critical clinical variables only observed in electronic health records.
    Patorno E; Gopalakrishnan C; Franklin JM; Brodovicz KG; Masso-Gonzalez E; Bartels DB; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2018 Apr; 20(4):974-984. PubMed ID: 29206336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.