These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38111940)

  • 1. How long does the recovery of corneal sensitivity in different corneal regions take after LASEK?
    Mirzajani A; Bouyeh A; Khezri F; Jafarzadehpur E; Karimian F
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(12):2056-2062. PubMed ID: 38111940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Recovery of corneal sensitivity in extremely high myopia after laser sub-epithelium keratomileusis].
    Zhou H; Chu RY; Wu Y; Zhou XT; Dai JH; Yao PJ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 43(6):530-4. PubMed ID: 17897531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Recovery of corneal sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy].
    Wu Y; Chu RY; Zhou XT; Dai JH; Qu XM
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 41(11):972-6. PubMed ID: 16318745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recovery of corneal sensitivity after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Wu Y; Chu RY; Zhou XT; Dai JH; Qu XM; Rao S; Lam D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):785-8. PubMed ID: 16765795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.
    Kuryan J; Cheema A; Chuck RS
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):CD011080. PubMed ID: 28197998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of corneal haze using an ablation depth/corneal thickness ratio after laser epithelial keratomileusis.
    Lin N; Yee SB; Mitra S; Chuang AZ; Yee RW
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(6):797-802. PubMed ID: 15586762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal sensation after laser epithelial keratomileusis for the correction of myopia.
    Herrmann WA; Shah C; Gabler B; Winkler von Mohrenfels C; Hufendiek K; Lohmann CP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 243(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15316794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for low myopia.
    Pérez-Santonja JJ; Sakla HF; Cardona C; Chipont E; Alió JL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 May; 127(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 10334340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tear film function and corneal sensation in the early postoperative period after LASEK for the correction of myopia.
    Herrmann WA; Shah CP; von Mohrenfels CW; Gabler B; Hufendiek K; Lohmann CP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 243(9):911-6. PubMed ID: 15834604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.
    Lim SA; Park Y; Cheong YJ; Na KS; Joo CK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 27051256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia. Results of a 2-year follow-up.
    Autrata R; Rehurek J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Nov; 29(11):2105-14. PubMed ID: 14670418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of myopia.
    Li SM; Zhan S; Li SY; Peng XX; Hu J; Law HA; Wang NL
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 2(2):CD009799. PubMed ID: 26899152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. LASEK and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: clinical and confocal microscopy comparison.
    Ghirlando A; Gambato C; Midena E
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 23(7):694-702. PubMed ID: 17912939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics After Surface Ablation Refractive Surgery and Novel Lamellar Refractive Surgery.
    Dou R; Wang Y; Xu L; Wu D; Wu W; Li X
    Cornea; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1441-6. PubMed ID: 26226471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction.
    Vestergaard AH
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Mar; 92 Thesis 2():1-21. PubMed ID: 24636364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [In vivo evaluation of corneal structure changes after refractive procedures].
    Rokita-Wala I; Gierek-Ciaciura S; Mrukwa-Kominek E
    Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(5-6):332-40. PubMed ID: 12664474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 17888086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of wave-front aberration and corneal Asphericity after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short and long term study.
    Yu M; Chen M; Liu W; Dai J
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 30894159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy in myopia.
    Zhao LQ; Wei RL; Cheng JW; Li Y; Cai JP; Ma XY
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Oct; 117(10):1912-22. PubMed ID: 20709406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.
    Shen Y; Chen Z; Knorz MC; Li M; Zhao J; Zhou X
    J Refract Surg; 2014 May; 30(5):310-8. PubMed ID: 24904933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.