These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38111949)

  • 1. Agreements' profile of Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with gold standard partial coherence interferometry.
    Sardari S; Fotouhi A; Jafarzadehpur E; Khabazkhoob M
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(12):2095-2104. PubMed ID: 38111949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The repeatability and agreement of biometric measurements by dual Scheimpflug device with integrated optical biometer.
    Hashemi H; Sardari S; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7748. PubMed ID: 35546610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
    Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Axial Length, Corneal Curvature, and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements of 2 Recently Introduced Devices to a Known Biometer.
    Shajari M; Cremonese C; Petermann K; Singh P; Müller M; Kohnen T
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 178():58-64. PubMed ID: 28263734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation between Standard Partial Coherence Interferometry-Based and Scheimpflug-Based Biometers: The Importance of Lens Constant Optimization.
    Sardari S; Khabazkhoob M; Jafarzadehpur E; Fotouhi A
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2023; 35(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 37680291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Biometry Measurements Using Standard Partial Coherence Interferometry versus New Scheimpflug Tomography with Integrated Axial Length Capability.
    Haddad JS; Barnwell E; Rocha KM; Ambrosio R; Waring Iv GO
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():353-358. PubMed ID: 32099321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation and comparison of a novel Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with standard partial coherence interferometry for biometry and intraocular lens power calculation.
    Wang Z; Yang W; Li D; Chen W; Zhao Q; Li Y; Cui R; Shen L; Xian J
    Exp Ther Med; 2021 Apr; 21(4):326. PubMed ID: 33732299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical Biometry and IOL Calculation in a Commercially Available Optical Coherence Tomography Device and Comparison With Pentacam AXL.
    Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Bazylczyk N; Wang X; Savini G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 246():236-241. PubMed ID: 36252676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a new Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometer and a low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    Ruiz-Mesa R; Abengózar-Vela A; Ruiz-Santos M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1406-1412. PubMed ID: 29223229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement Between Two Optical Biometers Based on Large Coherence Length SS-OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging/Partial Coherence Interferometry.
    Tu R; Yu J; Savini G; Ye J; Ning R; Xiong J; Chen S; Huang J
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):459-465. PubMed ID: 32644168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of implantable collamer Lens V4c on ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation based on Pentacam-AXL and IOLMaster 500.
    Zhang D; Yang M; Liu Z; Cai H; Chen X; Zhang C
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):421. PubMed ID: 36335303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
    Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy on agreement of anterior segment variables obtained by a swept-source biometer vs a Scheimpflug-based tomographer.
    Salouti R; Kamalipour A; Masihpour N; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti K; Nowroozzadeh MH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1229-1235. PubMed ID: 32483074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. OCT Biometry (B-OCT): A New Method for Measuring Ocular Axial Dimensions.
    Sikorski BL; Suchon P
    J Ophthalmol; 2019; 2019():9192456. PubMed ID: 31511790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer.
    Dehnavi Z; Khabazkhoob M; Mirzajani A; Jabbarvand M; Yekta A; Jafarzadehpur E
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2015; 22(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 25949084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability and agreement of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in myopes.
    Garcia Ardoy E; Mateos N; Roda L; Torrado Sierra O; Baptista AM; Serra PM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Sep; 106(7):783-792. PubMed ID: 36508569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of four optical biometers and one ultrasound biometer in eyes with dense cataracts.
    Tañá-Rivero P; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Tañá-Sanz P; Tañá-Sanz S; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2023 Sep; 10(1):35. PubMed ID: 37653460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
    Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences and Limits of Agreement among Pentacam, Corvis-ST, and IOL-Master 700 Optical Biometric Devices regarding Central Corneal Thickness Measurements.
    Rajabi S; Asharlous A; Riazi A; Khabazkhoob M; Moalej A
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2022; 34(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 35620377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
    Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.