These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38112629)

  • 1. Labor induction at 41
    Place K; Rahkonen L; Tekay A; Väyrynen K; Orden MR; Vääräsmäki M; Uotila J; Tihtonen K; Rinne K; Mäkikallio K; Heinonen S; Kruit H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 38112629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.
    Middleton P; Shepherd E; Morris J; Crowther CA; Gomersall JC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD004945. PubMed ID: 32666584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association between timing of labor induction and neonatal and maternal outcomes: an observational study from China.
    Hu Y; Chen B; Wang X; Zhu S; Bao S; Lu J; Wang L; Wang W; Wu C; Qi L; Wang Y; Li F; Xie W; Wu Y; Hu L; Xia Y; Lou B; Guo R; Xie B; Chen X; Han Y; Chen D; Ma H; Liang Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Oct; 6(10):101456. PubMed ID: 39151749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
    Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
    BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    Alkmark M; Keulen JKJ; Kortekaas JC; Bergh C; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Hagberg H; Mol BW; Molin M; van der Post JAM; Saltvedt S; Wikström AK; Wennerholm UB; de Miranda E
    PLoS Med; 2020 Dec; 17(12):e1003436. PubMed ID: 33290410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fonseca MJ; Santos F; Afreixo V; Silva IS; Almeida MDC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Oct; 253():213-219. PubMed ID: 32889327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
    Grobman WA; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.
    Grobman WA; Rice MM; Reddy UM; Tita ATN; Silver RM; Mallett G; Hill K; Thom EA; El-Sayed YY; Perez-Delboy A; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Boggess KA; Chauhan SP; Iams JD; Chien EK; Casey BM; Gibbs RS; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN; Macones GA;
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Aug; 379(6):513-523. PubMed ID: 30089070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.
    Rydahl E; Eriksen L; Juhl M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Feb; 17(2):170-208. PubMed ID: 30299344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
    Hersh AR; Urbanowicz E; Garg B; Schmidt EM; Packer CH; Caughey AB
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized controlled trial on early induction compared to expectant management of nulliparous women with prolonged latent phases.
    Bräne E; Olsson A; Andolf E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1042-9. PubMed ID: 24974855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labor in term pregnancies with isolated polyhydramnios: Is it beneficial or harmful?
    Lerner Y; Peled T; Priner Adler S; Rotem R; Sela HY; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Rottenstreich M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Sep; 166(3):1203-1211. PubMed ID: 38581215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction of labor compared to expectant management in term nulliparas with a latent phase of labor of more than 8 hours: a randomized trial.
    Sargunam PN; Bak LLM; Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Noor Azmi MA; Zaidi SN; Win ST; Omar SZ
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):493. PubMed ID: 31829138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week - 42 week dilemma.
    Kortekaas JC; Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Dillen J; Oudijk MA; Zwart JJ; Bakker JJ; de Bont D; Nieuwenhuijze M; Offerhaus PM; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche F; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():350. PubMed ID: 25338555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
    Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS OF GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT].
    Sgayer I; Frank Wolf M
    Harefuah; 2019 Dec; 158(12):802-806. PubMed ID: 31823535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Hong J; Atkinson J; Roddy Mitchell A; Tong S; Walker SP; Middleton A; Lindquist A; Hastie R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 May; 6(5):e2313162. PubMed ID: 37171818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.