These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38114077)

  • 1. Main Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction After Primary Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
    Marangi GF; Savani L; Gratteri M; Arcari L; Segreto F; Cagli B; Cogliandro A; Vega R; Mirra C; Persichetti P
    Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Mar; 44(4):375-382. PubMed ID: 38114077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient reported outcome and cosmetic evaluation following implant-based breast-reconstruction with a titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A prospective clinical study in 269 patients.
    Thill M; Faridi A; Meiré A; Gerber-Schäfer C; Baumann K; Blohmer JU; Mau C; Tofall S; Nolte E; Strittmatter HJ; Ohlinger R; Paepke S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1484-1490. PubMed ID: 32336622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The New Method of Pocket Forming for Breast Implant Placement in Augmentation Mammaplasty: Dual Plane Subfascial.
    Karabeg R; Jakirlic M; Karabeg A; Crnogorac D; Aslani I
    Med Arch; 2019 Jun; 73(3):178-182. PubMed ID: 31404122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
    Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-Stage Mastopexy-Lipofilling after Implant Removal in Cosmetic Breast Surgery.
    Mangialardi ML; Ozil C; Lepage C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(4):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 35064339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast Morphological Comparison Between Anatomic and Round Implant Augmentation: A Prospective Study.
    Liu Y; Zhang X; Luan J
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jan; 90(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 36534096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction With Breast Augmentation: A BREAST-Q Effect of Magnitude Analysis.
    Jørgensen MG; Hemmingsen MN; Larsen A; Weltz TK; Strålman KB; Andersen PS; Nezame Sarmady F; Toyserkani NM; Herly M; Elberg JJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Oct; 43(11):NP835-NP843. PubMed ID: 37378533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast Augmentation in the Transfemale Patient: Comprehensive Principles for Planning and Obtaining Ideal Results.
    Coon D; Lee E; Fischer B; Darrach H; Landford WN
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jun; 145(6):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 32459763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reoperative Augmentation Mammoplasty: An Algorithm to Optimize Soft-Tissue Support, Pocket Control, and Smooth Implant Stability with Composite Reverse Inferior Muscle Sling (CRIMS) and its Technical Variations.
    Munhoz AM; de Azevedo Marques Neto A; Maximiliano J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 46(3):1116-1132. PubMed ID: 35075504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast Reduction with Implants or Augmentation Reduction: Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
    Liang D; Edwards V; Di Taranto G
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Apr; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Muscle-Splitting Transaxillary Revision Breast Augmentation-A Single Surgeon's Experience.
    Stümpfle RL; Piccinini PS; Zanin EM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Oct; 45(5):2027-2033. PubMed ID: 33651144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fat Graft in Composite Breast Augmentation with Round Implants: A New Concept for Breast Reshaping.
    Maione L; Caviggioli F; Vinci V; Lisa A; Barbera F; Siliprandi M; Battistini A; Klinger F; Klinger M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 42(6):1465-1471. PubMed ID: 30264274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Augmentation: A Follow-Up of 6 Months.
    Luong KP; Peters M; Slijper HP; Hummelink S; Ulrich DJO
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Aug; 154(2):299-309. PubMed ID: 37647502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction.
    Gui GP; Tan SM; Faliakou EC; Choy C; A'Hern R; Ward A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 111(1):125-38; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 12496573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation.
    Pitanguy I; Vaena M; Radwanski HN; Nunes D; Vargas AF
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 17484059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PATIENT SATISFACTION AFTER BREAST RECONSTRUCTION: IMPLANTS VS. AUTOLOGOUS TISSUES.
    Fracon S; Renzi N; Manara M; Ramella V; Papa G; Arnež ZM
    Acta Chir Plast; 2018; 59(3-4):120-128. PubMed ID: 29651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
    Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.