These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38114767)

  • 1. Restricted Latent Class Models for Nominal Response Data: Identifiability and Estimation.
    Liu Y; Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):592-625. PubMed ID: 38114767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Note on Weaker Conditions for Identifying Restricted Latent Class Models for Binary Responses.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):158-174. PubMed ID: 35896935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Chen Y; Culpepper S; Liang F
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):121-153. PubMed ID: 31927684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):921-940. PubMed ID: 31432312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring Latent Structure in Polytomous Data with a Higher-Order Diagnostic Model.
    Culpepper SA; Balamuta JJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):368-386. PubMed ID: 34699299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifiability of Hidden Markov Models for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Liu Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2023 Jun; 88(2):361-386. PubMed ID: 36797538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifiability of Latent Class Models with Covariates.
    Ouyang J; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1343-1360. PubMed ID: 35254608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploratory Restricted Latent Class Models with Monotonicity Requirements under PÒLYA-GAMMA Data Augmentation.
    Balamuta JJ; Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):903-945. PubMed ID: 35023017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses.
    Lin M; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):717-740. PubMed ID: 38517594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Fang G; Liu J; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):19-40. PubMed ID: 30673967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian approach to restricted latent class models for scientifically structured clustering of multivariate binary outcomes.
    Wu Z; Casciola-Rosen L; Rosen A; Zeger SL
    Biometrics; 2021 Dec; 77(4):1431-1444. PubMed ID: 33031597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extending exploratory diagnostic classification models: Inferring the effect of covariates.
    Yigit HD; Culpepper SA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 May; 76(2):372-401. PubMed ID: 36601975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Spectral Method for Identifiable Grade of Membership Analysis with Binary Responses.
    Chen L; Gu Y
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):626-657. PubMed ID: 38360980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian inference of risk ratio of two proportions using a double sampling scheme.
    Rahardja D; Young DM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):393-404. PubMed ID: 21442515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian inference for multivariate probit model with latent envelope.
    Lee K; Park Y
    Biometrics; 2024 Jul; 80(3):. PubMed ID: 38949889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian generalized structured component analysis.
    Choi JY; Hwang H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):347-373. PubMed ID: 31049946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian Multinomial Probit MODEL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF PANEL CHOICE DATA.
    Fong DK; Kim S; Chen Z; DeSarbo WS
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):161-83. PubMed ID: 25491165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Global identifiability of latent class models with applications to diagnostic test accuracy studies: A Gröbner basis approach.
    Duan R; Cao M; Ning Y; Zhu M; Zhang B; McDermott A; Chu H; Zhou X; Moore JH; Ibrahim JG; Scharfstein DO; Chen Y
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 31444807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.