These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38114979)

  • 1. The impact of Bis-GMA free and Bis-GMA containing resin composite as posterior restoration on marginal integrity: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Reda SA; Hussein YF; Riad M
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):1022. PubMed ID: 38114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
    Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Correia AMO; Jurema ALB; Bresciani E; Caneppele TMF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):3083-3093. PubMed ID: 36763143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bulk-fill versus layering pure ormocer posterior restorations: A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
    Torres CR; Jurema AL; Souza MY; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    Am J Dent; 2021 Jun; 34(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 34143584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.
    Yazici AR; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Karahan S; Antonson SA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):417-426. PubMed ID: 34110494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 36-Month Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluation of Preheated and Room Temperature Resin Composite.
    Elkaffas AA; Eltoukhy RI; Elnegoly SA; Mahmoud SH
    Oper Dent; 2022 Jan; 47(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 35226749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.
    Endo Hoshino IA; Fraga Briso AL; Bueno Esteves LM; Dos Santos PH; Meira Borghi Frascino S; Fagundes TC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5697-5710. PubMed ID: 35556174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation.
    Estay J; Pardo-Díaz C; Reinoso E; Perez-Iñigo J; Martín J; Jorquera G; Kuga M; Fernández E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6087-6095. PubMed ID: 35608683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of different glass ionomer-based restoratives and a bulk-fill resin composite in Class I cavities: A 48-month randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
    Bayazıt EÖ; Başeren M; Meral E
    J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104473. PubMed ID: 36863696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of a nanohybrid and a flowable resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
    Karaman E; Yazici AR; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 22724113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations restored with self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill resin composites: A randomized clinical split-mouth trial.
    Maghaireh GA; Albashaireh ZS; Allouz HA
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104655. PubMed ID: 37562757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
    Dresch W; Volpato S; Gomes JC; Ribeiro NR; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 16924980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Barceleiro MO; Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Loguercio AD; Calazans FS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2023; 31():e20220323. PubMed ID: 36790298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Performance of Posterior Microhybrid Resin Composite Restorations Applied Using Regular and High-Power Mode Polymerization Protocols According to USPHS and SQUACE Criteria: 10-Year Randomized Controlled Split-Mouth Trial.
    Cerutti A; Barabanti N; Özcan M
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(4):343-351. PubMed ID: 32666060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
    Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.