133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38115367)
1. Comparison of the efficacy of 5% versus 8% acetic acid concentrations for detecting premalignant and malignant lesions in colposcopy.
Yilmaz A; Gulbahar A; Sen S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Dec; 102(50):e36341. PubMed ID: 38115367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Real-world research on cervical cancer screening program and effect evaluation for Chinese population].
Zhao YQ; Dai Y; Dang L; Kong LH; Zhang Y; Feng RM; Qiao YL; Lang JH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):764-771. PubMed ID: 30392341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Presence of histopathological premalignant lesions and infection caused by high-risk genotypes of human papillomavirus in patients with suspicious cytological and colposcopy results: A prospective study.
Golubović M; Lopičić M; Terzić N; Đurović M; Mugoša B; Mijović G
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2017 Jan; 74(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 29350503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study to determine efficacy of urinary HPV 16 & HPV 18 detection in predicting premalignant and malignant lesions of uterine cervix.
John JH; Halder A; Purwar S; Pushpalatha K; Gupta P; Dubey P
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 36184575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of the Triple Test Versus Colposcopy for the Diagnosis of Premalignant and Malignant Cervical Lesions.
Fatahi Meybodi N; Karimi-Zarchi M; Allahqoli L; Sekhavat L; Gitas G; Rahmani A; Fallahi A; Hassanlouei B; Alkatout I
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Dec; 21(12):3501-3507. PubMed ID: 33369445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective cohort study examining cervical cancer screening methods in HIV-positive and HIV-negative Cambodian Women: a comparison of human papilloma virus testing, visualization with acetic acid and digital colposcopy.
Thay S; Goldstein A; Goldstein LS; Govind V; Lim K; Seang C
BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e026887. PubMed ID: 30804036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective study of risk-based colposcopy demonstrates improved detection of cervical precancers.
Wentzensen N; Walker J; Smith K; Gold MA; Zuna R; Massad LS; Liu A; Silver MI; Dunn ST; Schiffman M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):604.e1-604.e8. PubMed ID: 29462629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Value of acetic acid smear test for cervical cancer screening].
Wu LY; Li N; Zhang WH; Li L; Pan QJ; Qiao YL; Rong SD; Zhao FH; Pretorius RG; Belinson JL
Ai Zheng; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1096-8. PubMed ID: 14558960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concordance of HPV, conventional smear, colposcopy, and conization results in cervical dysplasia.
Aydogan Kirmizi D; Baser E; Demir Caltekin M; Onat T; Sahin S; Yalvac ES
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jan; 49(1):132-139. PubMed ID: 33118711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term observational approach in women with histological diagnosis of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: an Italian multicentric retrospective cohort study.
Ciavattini A; Serri M; Di Giuseppe J; Liverani CA; Gardella B; Papiccio M; Delli Carpini G; Morini S; Clemente N; Sopracordevole F
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e024920. PubMed ID: 31272971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The application of deep learning based diagnostic system to cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions recognition in colposcopy images.
Yuan C; Yao Y; Cheng B; Cheng Y; Li Y; Li Y; Liu X; Cheng X; Xie X; Wu J; Wang X; Lu W
Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11639. PubMed ID: 32669565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Analysis of clinical features of cervical precancerous lesions in postmenopausal women].
Liu YY; Guo RX; Li BJ; Wu Y; Bai J; Li LX; Wang CF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):114-120. PubMed ID: 33631883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women.
Kececioglu M; Seckin B; Baser E; Togrul C; Kececioglu TS; Cicek MN; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):511-4. PubMed ID: 23534785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A pilot study of low-cost, high-resolution microendoscopy as a tool for identifying women with cervical precancer.
Pierce MC; Guan Y; Quinn MK; Zhang X; Zhang WH; Qiao YL; Castle P; Richards-Kortum R
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2012 Nov; 5(11):1273-9. PubMed ID: 22926339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical determinants of a positive visual inspection after treatment with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening.
Castle PE; Qiao YL; Zhao FH; Chen W; Valdez M; Zhang X; Kang LN; Bansil P; Paul P; Bai P; Peck R; Li J; Chen F; Jeronimo J
BJOG; 2014 May; 121(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 24575872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
