These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38117808)

  • 1. Providing a comprehensive approach to oil well blowout risk assessment.
    Satiarvand M; Orak N; Varshosaz K; Hassan EM; Cheraghi M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0296086. PubMed ID: 38117808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Providing an approach to analyze the risk of central oxygen tanks in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Laal F; Hanifi SM; Madvari RF; Khoshakhlagh AH; Arefi MF
    Heliyon; 2023 Aug; 9(8):e18736. PubMed ID: 37554837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk assessment of inter-basin water transfer plans through integration of Fault Tree Analysis and Bayesian Network modelling approaches.
    Roozbahani A; Ghanian T
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 356():120703. PubMed ID: 38537461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human Factor Risk Modeling for Shipyard Operation by Mapping Fuzzy Fault Tree into Bayesian Network.
    Liu Y; Ma X; Qiao W; Luo H; He P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fuzzy Bayesian estimation and consequence modeling of the domino effects of methanol storage tanks.
    Pouyakian M; Laal F; Jafari MJ; Nourai F; Kabir S
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Dec; 28(4):2509-2519. PubMed ID: 34842059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards a Fuzzy Bayesian Network Based Approach for Safety Risk Analysis of Tunnel-Induced Pipeline Damage.
    Zhang L; Wu X; Qin Y; Skibniewski MJ; Liu W
    Risk Anal; 2016 Feb; 36(2):278-301. PubMed ID: 26224125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires.
    Yuan Q; Zhu H; Zhang X; Zhang B; Zhang X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects.
    Leu SS; Chang CM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 May; 54():122-33. PubMed ID: 23499984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the probability of occupational fall incidents: a Bayesian network model for the oil industry.
    Shokouhi Y; Nassiri P; Mohammadfam I; Azam K
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2021 Sep; 27(3):654-663. PubMed ID: 31538862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk assessment of infectious disease epidemic based on fuzzy Bayesian network.
    Fu L; Yang Q; Liu X; He L
    Risk Anal; 2024 Jan; 44(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 37038093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fuzzy fault tree assessment based on improved AHP for fire and explosion accidents for steel oil storage tanks.
    Shi L; Shuai J; Xu K
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Aug; 278():529-38. PubMed ID: 25010458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis based on modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for fire and explosion in the process industry.
    Yazdi M; Korhan O; Daneshvar S
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2020 Jun; 26(2):319-335. PubMed ID: 29557291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probabilistic risk analysis for coal mine gas overrun based on FAHP and BN: a case study.
    He S; Lu Y; Li M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(19):28458-28468. PubMed ID: 34993806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marine and offshore safety assessment by incorporative risk modeling in a fuzzy-Bayesian network of an induced mass assignment paradigm.
    Eleye-Datubo AG; Wall A; Wang J
    Risk Anal; 2008 Feb; 28(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 18304109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Risk Treatment Strategy Model for Oil Pipeline Accidents Based on a Bayesian Decision Network Model.
    Zhang C; Wang W; Xu F; Chen Y; Qin T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 36293630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased Use of Bayesian Network Models Has Improved Environmental Risk Assessments.
    Moe SJ; Carriger JF; Glendell M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Jan; 17(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 33205856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of Bayesian networks in quantitative risk assessment of subsea blowout preventer operations.
    Cai B; Liu Y; Liu Z; Tian X; Zhang Y; Ji R
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jul; 33(7):1293-311. PubMed ID: 23106231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Importance-Based Key Basic Event Identification and Evolution Mechanism Investigation of Hydraulic Support Failure to Protect Employee Health.
    Xu Q; Xu K
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bimodal fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (BFAHP) for coronary heart disease risk assessment.
    Sabahi F
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jul; 83():204-216. PubMed ID: 29625186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fault and event tree analyses for process systems risk analysis: uncertainty handling formulations.
    Ferdous R; Khan F; Sadiq R; Amyotte P; Veitch B
    Risk Anal; 2011 Jan; 31(1):86-107. PubMed ID: 20731791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.