118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38123416)
1. Sagittal condylar guidance angle measurement methods: A systematic review.
Lassmann Ł; Nowak Z; Żółtowska A
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 38123416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance by protrusive interocclusal records with panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs in dentulous population: A clinico-radiographic study.
Galagali G; Kalekhan SM; Nidawani P; Naik J; Behera S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 27141164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Sagittal Condylar Guidance with Protrusive Inter-occlusal Method, Panoramic Radiographs, and Lateral Cephalogram: A Comparative Study.
Singh K; Singh A; Jayam C; Singh R; Huda I; Nabi AT
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 34028362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans.
Prasad KD; Shah N; Hegde C
Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Oct; 3(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 23633793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Evaluation of the Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Protrusive Interocclusal Records, OPG, and CBCT in Edentulous Patients: An
Gheedle R; John P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jun; 24(6):403-408. PubMed ID: 37534507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.
Kumar CD; Selvaraj S; Mohan J; Raju R
Ann Afr Med; 2023; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance angles using computerized pantographic tracings, protrusive interocclusal records, and 3D-CBCT imaging techniques for oral rehabilitation.
Naqash TA; Chaturvedi S; Yaqoob A; Saquib S; Addas MK; Alfarsi M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):550-554. PubMed ID: 32246664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinico-radiographic study to compare and co-relate sagittal condylar guidance determined by intraoral gothic arch tracing method and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients.
Shetty S; Kunta M; Shenoy K
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29430137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study.
Tannamala PK; Pulagam M; Pottem SR; Swapna B
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Determined by Panoramic Radiographs to the One Determined by Conventional Methods Using Lateral Interocclusal Records in the Saudi Arabian Population.
Dewan H; Akkam TI; Chohan H; Sherwani A; Masha F; Dhae M
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 32039080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An
Keerthana SR; Mohammed HS; Hariprasad A; Anand M; Ayesha S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 34810368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of Condylar Guidance Determined by Panoramic Radiographs to One Determined by Conventional Methods.
Godavarthi AS; Sajjan MC; Raju AV; Rajeshkumar P; Premalatha A; Chava N
J Int Oral Health; 2015 Aug; 7(8):123-8. PubMed ID: 26464554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A study on the accuracy of horizontal condylar guidance values in edentulous patients using preprosthetic diagnostic radiographs.
Paul R; Das S; Bhattacharyya J; Ghosh S; Goel P; Dutta K
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 30111916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of accuracy between extraoral Gothic arch tracing and various other methods assessing horizontal condylar guidance angle in completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Potdukhe SS; Iyer JM; Nadgere JB
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(4):322-334. PubMed ID: 37861609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of condylar inclination of dentulous subjects determined by axiograph and to compare with manual programming of articulators using protrusive interocclusal record.
Prasad KD; Shetty M; Chandy BK
Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 26321837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy between protrusive interocclusal record and horizontal condylar guidance angle recording methods in dentulous patients.
Potdukhe SS; Iyer JM; Nadgere JB
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Jan; 24(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 38263553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Value from Radiograph with Interocclusal Records made During Jaw Relation and Try-in: A Pilot Study.
Shetty S; Satish Babu CL; Tambake D; Surendra Kumar GP; Setpal AT
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Sep; 13(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 24431754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of protrusive interocclusal records to pantographic tracings.
Curtis DA
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 2668509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
Goyal MK; Goyal S
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
