These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38123462)

  • 21. Image rejects in general direct digital radiography.
    Hofmann B; Rosanowsky TB; Jensen C; Wah KH
    Acta Radiol Open; 2015 Oct; 4(10):2058460115604339. PubMed ID: 26500784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.
    Nol J; Isouard G; Mirecki J
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. AAPM task group report 305: Guidance for standardization of vendor-neutral reject analysis in radiography.
    Little K; Reiser I; Apgar B; Dalal P; Dave J; Fisher R; Hulme K; Jafari ME; Marshall E; Meyer S; Moore Q; Murphy N; Nishino T; Nye K; O'Donnell K; Sabol J; Sanchez A; Sensakovic W; Tarbox L; Uzenoff R; Walz-Flannigan A; Willis C; Zhang J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 May; 24(5):e13938. PubMed ID: 36995917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital Radiography Reject Analysis: Results of a Survey Among Dutch Hospitals.
    Bijwaard H; de Waard-Schalkx I; Noij S
    Radiol Technol; 2020 May; 91(5):482-484. PubMed ID: 32381667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 30585956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative assessment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations.
    Seo D; Jang S; Kim J; Kim J; Sung D; Kim H; Yoon Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23887271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography.
    Hasaneen M; AlHameli N; AlMinhali A; Alshehhi S; Salih S; Alomaim MM
    J Med Life; 2023 May; 16(5):731-735. PubMed ID: 37520472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.
    Scott AW; Zhou Y; Allahverdian J; Nute JL; Lee C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):343-355. PubMed ID: 27929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ICRP recommendations on 'Managing patient dose in digital radiology'.
    Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):126-30. PubMed ID: 15933093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unified Database for Rejected Image Analysis Across Multiple Vendors in Radiography.
    Little KJ; Reiser I; Liu L; Kinsey T; Sánchez AA; Haas K; Mallory F; Froman C; Lu ZF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Feb; 14(2):208-216. PubMed ID: 27663061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimisation of patient protection and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
    Korir GK; Wambani JS; Ochieng BO
    East Afr Med J; 2010 Mar; 87(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 23057309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital fluoroscopic radiology: evaluation of the clinical impact.
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Georgi M
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Jun; 17(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 8348910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Short-term impact of pictorial posters and a crash course on radiographic errors for improving the quality of paediatric chest radiographs in an unsupervised unit - a pilot study for quality-assurance outreach.
    Hlabangana LT; Andronikou S
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Feb; 45(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 25129339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dose levels from thoracic and pelvic examinations in two pediatric radiological departments in Norway - a comparison study of dose-area product and radiographic technique.
    Sæther HK; Lagesen B; Trægde Martinsen AC; Holsen EP; Øvrebø KM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1137-42. PubMed ID: 20860497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is reject analysis necessary after converting to computed radiography?
    Honea R; Elissa Blado M; Ma Y
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():41-52. PubMed ID: 12105696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.