These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38123462)

  • 41. Quality assurance in digital dental radiography--justification and dose reduction in dental and maxillofacial radiology.
    Hellstern F; Geibel MA
    Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 22930946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Digital radiograph rejection analysis during "Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic" in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.
    Ali A; Yaseen M
    Chin J Acad Radiol; 2021; 4(2):133-140. PubMed ID: 34124580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
    Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
    Berliner L; Buffa A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of varying X-ray tube voltage and additional filtration on image quality and patient dose in digital radiography system.
    E A; A Y; T O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Sep; 199():110893. PubMed ID: 37321050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quality control of storage phosphor digital radiography systems.
    Freedman M; Steller D; Jafroudi H; Mun SK
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 May; 8(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 7612704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
    Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. To keep or reject, that is the question - A survey on radiologists and radiographers' assessments of plain radiography images.
    Kjelle E; Schanche AK; Hafskjold L
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):115-119. PubMed ID: 32682730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
    Compagnone G; Baleni MC; Pagan L; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):899-904. PubMed ID: 17065288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Determination and Analysis of Film Reject Rate at Eight Selected Governmental Diagnostic X-Ray Facilities in Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopian.
    Arbese MY; Abebe TD; Mesele BA
    J Med Phys; 2018; 43(4):270-276. PubMed ID: 30636853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review.
    Yeung AWK; Wong NSM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Dosimetric evaluations in dental radiology: comparison of the digital system and the conventional system].
    Blanc M; Nessi R; Paruccini N; Castellana L
    Radiol Med; 1995 Mar; 89(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 7754128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Series: Practical Evaluation of Clinical Image Quality (4): Determination of Image Quality in Digital Radiography System].
    Katayama R
    Igaku Butsuri; 2016; 36(3):166-172. PubMed ID: 28442655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Quality control of thoracic X-rays in children in diagnostic centers with and without pediatric-radiologic competence].
    Alt CD; Engelmann D; Schenk JP; Troeger J
    Rofo; 2006 Feb; 178(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 16435250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rejection and redistribution of scattered radiation in scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): simulation with spot images.
    Liu X; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2718-29. PubMed ID: 17821980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. From pixel to image analysis.
    van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Feb; 50(2):20200305. PubMed ID: 33119990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Investigation of possible methods for equipment self-tests in digital radiology.
    Zoetelief J; Idris HH; Jansen JT
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):269-73. PubMed ID: 16461526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the post-processing algorithms SimGrid and S-Enhance for paediatric intensive care patients and neonates.
    Krueger PC; Ebeling K; Waginger M; Glutig K; Scheithauer M; Schlattmann P; Proquitté H; Mentzel HJ
    Pediatr Radiol; 2022 May; 52(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 35192022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dose audit for patients undergoing two common radiography examinations with digital radiology systems.
    İnal T; Ataç G
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2014; 20(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 24317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.