These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38123826)
1. Semantic feature norms: a cross-method and cross-language comparison. Kivisaari SL; Hultén A; van Vliet M; Lindh-Knuutila T; Salmelin R Behav Res Methods; 2024 Sep; 56(6):5788-5797. PubMed ID: 38123826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spanish semantic feature production norms for 400 concrete concepts. Vivas J; Vivas L; Comesaña A; Coni AG; Vorano A Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):1095-1106. PubMed ID: 27503302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Vinson DP; Vigliocco G Behav Res Methods; 2008 Feb; 40(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 18411541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Category production norms for 117 concrete and abstract categories. Banks B; Connell L Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1292-1313. PubMed ID: 35650380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A set of semantic norms for German and Italian. Kremer G; Baroni M Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 21287119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability in content analysis: The case of semantic feature norms classification. Bolognesi M; Pilgram R; van den Heerik R Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):1984-2001. PubMed ID: 28039680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. French categorization norms for 70 semantic categories and comparison with Van Overschelde et al.'s (2004) English norms. Bueno S; Megherbi H Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1018-28. PubMed ID: 19897810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The contributions of language and experience to the representation of abstract and concrete words: different weights but similar organizations. Marques JF; Nunes LD Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1266-75. PubMed ID: 22673880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feats: A database of semantic features for early produced noun concepts. Borovsky A; Peters RE; Cox JI; McRae K Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3259-3279. PubMed ID: 38148439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. McRae K; Cree GS; Seidenberg MS; McNorgan C Behav Res Methods; 2005 Nov; 37(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 16629288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):718-30. PubMed ID: 23239067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feature distinctiveness effects in language acquisition and lexical processing: Insights from megastudies. Siew CSQ Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):669-685. PubMed ID: 31974763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. English semantic feature production norms: An extended database of 4436 concepts. Buchanan EM; Valentine KD; Maxwell NP Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1849-1863. PubMed ID: 31044359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local similarity and global variability characterize the semantic space of human languages. Lewis M; Cahill A; Madnani N; Evans J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Dec; 120(51):e2300986120. PubMed ID: 38079546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Lynott D; Connell L; Brysbaert M; Brand J; Carney J Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1271-1291. PubMed ID: 31832879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Affective norms for 380 Spanish words belonging to three different semantic categories. Ferré P; Guasch M; Moldovan C; Sánchez-Casas R Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 22042646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emotional words in Spanish: Adaptation and cross-cultural differences for the affective norms for English words (ANEW) on a sample of Argentinian adults. Sarli L; Justel N Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1595-1610. PubMed ID: 34505999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When is best-worst best? A comparison of best-worst scaling, numeric estimation, and rating scales for collection of semantic norms. Hollis G; Westbury C Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):115-133. PubMed ID: 29322399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emoji-based semantic representations for abstract and concrete concepts. Wicke P; Bolognesi M Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):615-635. PubMed ID: 32383010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]