These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38125302)
1. Machine learning analysis with the comprehensive index of corneal tomographic and biomechanical parameters in detecting pediatric subclinical keratoconus. Ren S; Yang K; Xu L; Fan Q; Gu Y; Pang C; Zhao D Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1273500. PubMed ID: 38125302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients. Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of new Corvis ST parameters for detecting subclinical and clinical keratoconus eyes in a Chinese population. Ren S; Xu L; Fan Q; Gu Y; Yang K Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):4962. PubMed ID: 33654120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical properties analysis of forme fruste keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus. Huo Y; Chen X; Cao H; Li J; Hou J; Wang Y Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1311-1320. PubMed ID: 36441226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal biomechanics in normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes. Peyman A; Sepahvand F; Pourazizi M; Noorshargh P; Forouhari A BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):459. PubMed ID: 37968616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas. Guo LL; Tian L; Cao K; Li YX; Li N; Yang WQ; Jie Y Semin Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 36(8):671-678. PubMed ID: 33734947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population. Kataria P; Padmanabhan P; Gopalakrishnan A; Padmanaban V; Mahadik S; Ambrósio R J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30527442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The application of corneal biomechanical interocular asymmetry for the diagnosis of keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus. Dong R; Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1266940. PubMed ID: 37869711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parental Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Characteristics of Patients With Keratoconus. Li J; Zhang BN; Jhanji V; Wang X; Li D; Du X Am J Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 256():146-155. PubMed ID: 37567431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Combined Biomechanical and Tomographic Model for Identifying Cases of Subclinical Keratoconus. Atalay E; Özalp O; Erol MA; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N Cornea; 2020 Apr; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 31738245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Corneal Tomography and a New Combined Tomographic Biomechanical Index in Subclinical Keratoconus. Chan TCY; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V J Refract Surg; 2018 Sep; 34(9):616-621. PubMed ID: 30199566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus. Song Y; Feng Y; Qu M; Ma Q; Tian H; Li D; He R Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36255612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus. Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of Scheimpflug Tomography Parameters for Detecting Subclinical Keratoconus in the Fellow Eyes of Patients with Unilateral Keratoconus in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Al Somali A; Najmi H; Alsawadi H; Alsawadi H; AlMalki A; Alhamoud M; Alhatlan H; Alwohaibi N Clin Ophthalmol; 2024; 18():277-287. PubMed ID: 38312308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of bilateral differential characteristics of corneal biomechanics between keratoconus and normal eyes. Xian Y; Zhao Y; Sun L; Zhang X; Ding L; Liu Z; Li Y; Ding Y; Jiang L; Zhou X; Shen Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1163223. PubMed ID: 37324412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Higher Order Aberrations for the Detection of Keratoconus and Suspect Keratoconus. Salman A; Kailani O; Marshall J; Ghabra M; Balamoun AA; Darwish TR; Badla AA; Alhaji H Tomography; 2022 Dec; 8(6):2864-2873. PubMed ID: 36548532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Accuracy of Corneal and Epithelial Thickness Map Parameters to Detect Keratoconus and Suspect Keratoconus. Salman A; Mazzotta C; Kailani O; Ghabra M; Omran R; Balamoun AA; Darwish T; Shaaban R; Alhaji H J Ophthalmol; 2023; 2023():6677932. PubMed ID: 37842327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of two biomechanical stiffness indexes in the diagnosis of eratoconus and their changes after corneal collagen cross-linking surgery]. Liu GY; Jing LL; Li J; Du XL Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 58(8):584-591. PubMed ID: 35959602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of corneal topographic, tomographic and biomechanical indices for detecting clinical and subclinical keratoconus: a comprehensive three-device study. Heidari Z; Hashemi H; Mohammadpour M; Amanzadeh K; Fotouhi A Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(2):228-239. PubMed ID: 33614451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Longitudinal Analysis of Corneal Biomechanics of Suspect Keratoconus: A Prospective Case-Control Study. Huo Y; Chen X; Xie R; Li J; Wang Y Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 38790289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]