These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38125794)
1. Comparison of the effectiveness of zero-profile device and plate cage construct in the treatment of one-level cervical disc degenerative disease combined with moderate to severe paraspinal muscle degeneration. Abudouaini H; Xu H; Yang J; Yi M; Lin K; Wang S Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1283795. PubMed ID: 38125794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of different zero-profile spacers in the treatment of two-level cervical degenerative disk disease. Xiong X; Liu JM; Chen WW; Liu ZH; Zhou RP; Chen JW; Liu ZL Eur Spine J; 2023 Jul; 32(7):2448-2458. PubMed ID: 37198504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study. Wu WJ; Jiang LS; Liang Y; Dai LY Eur Spine J; 2012 Jul; 21(7):1374-82. PubMed ID: 22205113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision Surgery for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disc Degeneration after Initial Anterior Cervical Fusion: Is ROI-C Better than Plate-Cage Construct? Niu J; Song D; Liu Y; Wang H; Huang C; Yu H; Deng Z; Zou J; Yang H Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6597754. PubMed ID: 34970626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage for the treatment of the single and multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease. Li Z; Wang H; Li L; Tang J; Ren D; Hou S J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():115-122. PubMed ID: 28262396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of combined anteroposterior fusion with no plate versus anterior fusion alone with cage and plate for multilevel degenerative cervical disease. Song KJ; Song JS; Kim DY; Shim DG; Lee KB Spine J; 2014 Apr; 14(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 24144691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile VA spacer device: a clinical and radiological study with two-year follow-up. Zhao HH; Xu HW; Wang SJ; Hu T; Wu DS J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):51. PubMed ID: 38212759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up. Chen Y; Lü G; Wang B; Li L; Kuang L Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2255-62. PubMed ID: 26906171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Li Z; Zhao Y; Tang J; Ren D; Guo J; Wang H; Li L; Hou S Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1129-1139. PubMed ID: 27554353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and plate fixation in 2-level noncontiguous anterior cervical discectomy and fusion- a retrospective study. Zhang Z; Li Y; Jiang W BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Apr; 19(1):119. PubMed ID: 29665815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Wang Z; Jiang W; Li X; Wang H; Shi J; Chen J; Meng B; Yang H Eur Spine J; 2015 Jan; 24(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 25337859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article. Njoku I; Alimi M; Leng LZ; Shin BJ; James AR; Bhangoo S; Tsiouris AJ; Härtl R J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 25105338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of a self-locking stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate for ACDF: Minimum 3-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Zhou J; Li J; Lin H; Li X; Zhou X; Dong J Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 170():73-78. PubMed ID: 29734112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fatty infiltration in cervical extensor muscle: is there a relationship with cervical sagittal alignment after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? Wang XJ; Huang KK; He JB; Wu TK; Rong X; Liu H BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jul; 23(1):641. PubMed ID: 35791024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Efficiency of Zero-profile Implant in Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Long-term Follow-up Study. Li Y; Hao D; He B; Wang X; Yan L J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):398-403. PubMed ID: 24136051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes of locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lu VM; Mobbs RJ; Fang B; Phan K Eur Spine J; 2019 Jan; 28(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 30390163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study. Shi S; Liu ZD; Li XF; Qian L; Zhong GB; Chen FJ Spine J; 2015 Sep; 15(9):1973-80. PubMed ID: 25912505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Liu Y; Wang H; Li X; Chen J; Sun H; Wang G; Yang H; Jiang W Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1881-90. PubMed ID: 26968876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical sagittal balance after consecutive three-level hybrid surgery versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: radiological results from a single-center experience. Chen S; Deng Y; Liu H; Wu T; Huang K; He J; Wang B J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):345. PubMed ID: 37165448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Efficacy comparison of zero-profile intervertebral fusion and stand-alone interbody cage combined with cage-titanium plate construct in treatment of two-segment skip cervical spondylosis]. Xia BC; Sun JG; Huang SL; Tian LY; Zhu YH; Pi GF Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 May; 102(19):1450-1457. PubMed ID: 35599410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]