These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38125840)

  • 1. Abortion access in the Americas: a hemispheric and historical approach.
    Roth C
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1284737. PubMed ID: 38125840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Activism for Abortion Rights and Access Is Global: What the United States Can Learn from the Rest of the World.
    Kumar A
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 36693184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case.
    Cook RJ
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 2628654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The abortion struggle in America.
    Warren MA
    Bioethics; 1989 Oct; 3(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 11651956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion politics in the United States, 1972-1994: from single issue to ideology.
    Hout M
    Gender Issues; 1999; 17(2):3-34. PubMed ID: 12349270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
    Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion laws in the United States: Turning the calendar back 50 years?
    Macklin R
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(3):175-178. PubMed ID: 35699297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
    Baron CH
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A world without Roe: how different would it be?
    Glendon MA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.
    Byron JJ; Avalos M; Xiao KA; Klein AA; Leheste JR
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32100. PubMed ID: 36601141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenging the US Supreme Court's Majority Ruling on
    Berer M
    Health Hum Rights; 2023 Jun; 25(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 37397425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feminist theory confronts US Supreme Court rhetoric: the case of abortion rights.
    Binion G
    Int J Law Policy Family; 1997; 11(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 16848074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. (Re)criminalizing Abortion: Returning to the Political with Stories.
    Annas GJ
    J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 38088615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
    Gleeson K
    ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive rights: an international sample.
    Boyd S
    Conscience; 1984; 5(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 12178930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.