These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38126284)

  • 1. Penoscrotal approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implant: why it should be preferred.
    Ricapito A; Sedigh O; Rubino M; Gobbo A; Falagario UG; Annese P; Mancini V; Ferro M; Buffi N; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Busetto GM; Bettocchi C
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2023 Dec; 75(6):711-717. PubMed ID: 38126284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Infrapubic vs Penoscrotal Approaches for 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement: Do We Have a Winner?
    Palmisano F; Boeri L; Cristini C; Antonini G; Spinelli MG; Franco G; Longo F; Gadda F; Colombo F; Montanari E
    Sex Med Rev; 2018 Oct; 6(4):631-639. PubMed ID: 29730314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical approaches for penile prosthesis implantation: penoscrotal vs infrapubic.
    Montague DK; Angermeir KW
    Int J Impot Res; 2003 Oct; 15 Suppl 5():S134-5. PubMed ID: 14551592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infrapubic approach for placement of inflatable penile prosthesis: contemporary review of technique and implications.
    Jayadevan R; Eleswarapu SV; Mills JN
    Int J Impot Res; 2020 Jan; 32(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 31537910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infrapubic surgical approach for penile prosthesis surgery: Indications and technique.
    Picola Brau N; Torremadé J
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Jun; 44(5):301-308. PubMed ID: 32115278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.
    Grande P; Antonini G; Cristini C; De Berardinis E; Gatto A; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Gentile G; Di Pierro GB
    World J Urol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1167-1174. PubMed ID: 29492584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: a comparison of the penoscrotal and infrapubic surgical approaches.
    Candela JV; Hellstrom WJ
    J La State Med Soc; 1996 Jul; 148(7):296-301. PubMed ID: 8816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Penile prosthesis surgery: Indications and penoscrotal approach.
    Vendeira P
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Jun; 44(5):377-381. PubMed ID: 32493599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes.
    Loh-Doyle J; Patil MB; Sawkar H; Wayne K; Boyd SD
    J Sex Med; 2018 Jun; 15(6):907-913. PubMed ID: 29452979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ambicor 2-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Who and How?
    Abdelsayed GA; Levine LA
    J Sex Med; 2018 Mar; 15(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 29339015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concomitant ventral phalloplasty during penile implant surgery: a novel procedure that optimizes patient satisfaction and their perception of phallic length after penile implant surgery.
    Miranda-Sousa A; Keating M; Moreira S; Baker M; Carrion R
    J Sex Med; 2007 Sep; 4(5):1494-9. PubMed ID: 17727355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation.
    Çayan S; Aşcı R; Efesoy O; Bolat MS; Akbay E; Yaman Ö
    J Sex Med; 2019 Jul; 16(7):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 31155387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subcoronal inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: indications and outcomes.
    Feng CL; Langbo WA; Anderson LK; Cao D; Bajic P; Amarasekera C; Wang V; Levine LA
    J Sex Med; 2023 May; 20(6):888-892. PubMed ID: 37076135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The good, the bad, and the ugly about surgical approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.
    Otero JR; Manfredi C; Wilson SK
    Int J Impot Res; 2022 Mar; 34(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 32488210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaeer's infrapubic technique for penile prosthesis implantation through a single midline corporotomy: A single-center pilot study.
    Shaeer O; Shaeer K
    J Sex Med; 2023 Feb; 20(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 36763924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unexpected nuances of the penoscrotal inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Wilson SK; Perito P; Park SSH; Mulcahy J
    Int J Impot Res; 2022 Aug; 34(5):416-423. PubMed ID: 32778773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difference of opinion - Inflatable Penile Prosthesis - Opinion: Why I prefer the penoscrotal access.
    Gromatzky C
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):410-1. PubMed ID: 26200534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study and literature review.
    Di Pierro GB; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Grande P; Frisenda M; Del Giudice F; Antonini G; Nardi F; De Berardinis E; Cristini C; Franco G; Sciarra A; Salciccia S
    Andrology; 2024 Mar; 12(3):624-632. PubMed ID: 37452742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Difference of opinion - Inflatable Penile Prosthesis - Opinion: Why I prefer the infrapubic access.
    Bertero EB
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):408-9. PubMed ID: 26200533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infrapubic approach for malleable penile implant.
    Berg OL
    Int Braz J Urol; 2011; 37(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 21385485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.