164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38126339)
21. The utility of
Kitajima K; Kawanaka Y; Komoto H; Minami T; Yokoi T; Kuribayashi K; Kijima T; Nakamura A; Hashimoto M; Kondo N; Hasegawa S; Yamakado K
Hell J Nucl Med; 2021; 24(3):186-198. PubMed ID: 34901959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using
Kitajima K; Watabe T; Nakajo M; Ishibashi M; Daisaki H; Soeda F; Tanemura A; Kanekura T; Yamazaki N; Ito K
Jpn J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 34287739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of extremities: PERCIST versus RECIST 1.1 criteria after long-term follow-up.
Xu J; Li Y; Xie L; Sun X; Cai Z; Wang S; Wang Q; Sun K; Guo W
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 36(6):553-561. PubMed ID: 35380350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tebentafusp: T Cell Redirection for the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.
Damato BE; Dukes J; Goodall H; Carvajal RD
Cancers (Basel); 2019 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 31336704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Hendel HW
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23572497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tebentafusp as a Promising Drug for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.
Al Balushi K; Al Hadhrami A; Balushi HA; Al Lawati A; Das S
Curr Drug Targets; 2024; 25(3):149-157. PubMed ID: 38115619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Immune-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (imRECIST): Refining Guidelines to Assess the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Immunotherapy.
Hodi FS; Ballinger M; Lyons B; Soria JC; Nishino M; Tabernero J; Powles T; Smith D; Hoos A; McKenna C; Beyer U; Rhee I; Fine G; Winslow N; Chen DS; Wolchok JD
J Clin Oncol; 2018 Mar; 36(9):850-858. PubMed ID: 29341833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT for monitoring therapy response in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Riedl CC; Pinker K; Ulaner GA; Ong LT; Baltzer P; Jochelson MS; McArthur HL; Gönen M; Dickler M; Weber WA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(9):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 28462446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria, and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors for evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy and prognosis prediction in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Kitajima K; Maruyama M; Minami T; Yokoi T; Kuribayashi K; Kijima T; Hashimoto M; Hasegawa S; Yamakado K
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Aug; 41(8):790-799. PubMed ID: 32516245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tebentafusp in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Patient Selection and Special Considerations.
Montazeri K; Pattanayak V; Sullivan RJ
Drug Des Devel Ther; 2023; 17():333-339. PubMed ID: 36785760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Tebentafusp in first-line melanoma trials: An outperforming outlier.
Olivier T; Prasad V
Transl Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20():101408. PubMed ID: 35364557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review.
Min SJ; Jang HJ; Kim JH
Oncotarget; 2016 May; 7(19):27848-54. PubMed ID: 27036043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Phase I Study of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tebentafusp Using a Step-Up Dosing Regimen and Expansion in Patients With Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.
Carvajal RD; Nathan P; Sacco JJ; Orloff M; Hernandez-Aya LF; Yang J; Luke JJ; Butler MO; Stanhope S; Collins L; McAlpine C; Holland C; Abdullah SE; Sato T
J Clin Oncol; 2022 Jun; 40(17):1939-1948. PubMed ID: 35254876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Immuno-oncology approaches in uveal melanoma: tebentafusp and beyond.
Gerard C; Shum B; Nathan P; Turajlic S
Immunooncol Technol; 2023 Sep; 19():100386. PubMed ID: 37483658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of RECIST, iRECIST, and PERCIST for the Evaluation of Response to PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Therapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Beer L; Hochmair M; Haug AR; Schwabel B; Kifjak D; Wadsak W; Fuereder T; Fabikan H; Fazekas A; Schwab S; Mayerhoefer ME; Herold C; Prosch H
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 Jul; 44(7):535-543. PubMed ID: 31021918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative prognostic implication of treatment response assessments in mCRPC: PERCIST 1.0, RECIST 1.1, and PSA response criteria.
Velez EM; Desai B; Ji L; Quinn DI; Colletti PM; Jadvar H
Theranostics; 2020; 10(7):3254-3262. PubMed ID: 32194866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of WHO, RECIST 1.1, EORTC, and PERCIST criteria in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant solid tumors.
Aras M; Erdil TY; Dane F; Gungor S; Ones T; Dede F; Inanir S; Turoglu HT
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jan; 37(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26440568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Tebentafusp: a first-in-class treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma.
Howlett S; Carter TJ; Shaw HM; Nathan PD
Ther Adv Med Oncol; 2023; 15():17588359231160140. PubMed ID: 36970111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Measuring response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer using PSMA PET/CT: comparison of RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST, PPP, and RECIP 1.0 criteria.
Gafita A; Rauscher I; Fendler WP; Murthy V; Hui W; Armstrong WR; Herrmann K; Weber WA; Calais J; Eiber M; Weber M; Benz MR
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Oct; 49(12):4271-4281. PubMed ID: 35767071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.
Yanagawa M; Tatsumi M; Miyata H; Morii E; Tomiyama N; Watabe T; Isohashi K; Kato H; Shimosegawa E; Yamasaki M; Mori M; Doki Y; Hatazawa J
J Nucl Med; 2012 Jun; 53(6):872-80. PubMed ID: 22582049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
