These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38127115)

  • 1. Priming effect of individual similarity and ensemble perception in visual search and working memory.
    Lin W; Qian J
    Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):719-734. PubMed ID: 38127115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2022 Feb; 22(2):8. PubMed ID: 35156992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.
    Dube B; Golomb JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1592-1600. PubMed ID: 34027621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.
    Kerzel D; Andres MK
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for distinct mechanisms underlying attentional priming and sensory memory for bistable perception.
    Brinkhuis MA; Kristjánsson Á; Brascamp JW
    J Vis; 2015 Aug; 15(11):8. PubMed ID: 26270190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priming of pop-out on multiple time scales during visual search.
    Brascamp JW; Pels E; Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1972-8. PubMed ID: 21782839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.
    Wu Y; Pan Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):760-770. PubMed ID: 35359229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture.
    Gao Z; Yu S; Zhu C; Shui R; Weng X; Li P; Shen M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22822. PubMed ID: 26956084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the contributions of spatial and non-spatial working memory to priming of pop-out.
    Ahn J; Patel TN; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1012-1026. PubMed ID: 28176214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irrelevant features of distractors in intervening visual search tasks cause active visual working memory interference - the more difficult the search task, the more interference it causes.
    Lively Z; Ng GJP; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2410-2429. PubMed ID: 33977408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Berryhill ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1282-9. PubMed ID: 23702981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual working memory supports the inhibition of previously processed information: evidence from preview search.
    Al-Aidroos N; Emrich SM; Ferber S; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):643-63. PubMed ID: 21988363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The transition from feature to object: Storage unit in visual working memory depends on task difficulty.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Liu S; Lei Q
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1498-1514. PubMed ID: 31267436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.