These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38127210)

  • 1. Dishonest Physician Reviews: Challenging Physician Online Reviews and the Appeals Process.
    Malhotra R; Reddy A; Jotwani R; Schatman ME; Mehta ND
    J Med Syst; 2023 Dec; 48(1):5. PubMed ID: 38127210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining the Role of Physician Characteristics in Web-Based Verified Primary Care Physician Reviews: Observational Study.
    Sehgal NKR; Rader B; Brownstein JS
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jul; 26():e51672. PubMed ID: 39074363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence?
    Gilbert K; Hawkins CM; Hughes DR; Patel K; Gogia N; Sekhar A; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):867-71. PubMed ID: 26250980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative Patient Reviews and Online Defamation: A Guide for the Obstetrician-Gynecologist.
    Moutos CP; Verma K; Phelps JY
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 33156202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jack RA; Burn MB; McCulloch PC; Liberman SR; Varner KE; Harris JD
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28853024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
    Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
    Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Dermatology Practice Online Reviews: Lessons From Qualitative Analysis.
    Smith RJ; Lipoff JB
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Feb; 152(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 26606326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study.
    Yan Q; Jensen KJ; Thomas R; Field AR; Jiang Z; Goei C; Davies MG
    JMIR Cardio; 2021 Feb; 5(1):e22975. PubMed ID: 33625359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What Do Patients Think About Their Radiation Oncologists? An Assessment of Online Patient Reviews on Healthgrades.
    Prabhu AV; Randhawa S; Clump D; Heron DE; Beriwal S
    Cureus; 2018 Feb; 10(2):e2165. PubMed ID: 29644154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Impact of Social Media on Negative Online Physician Reviews: an Observational Study in a Large, Academic, Multispecialty Practice.
    Widmer RJ; Shepard M; Aase LA; Wald JT; Pruthi S; Timimi FK
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Jan; 34(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 30374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Dermatologist Ratings on Health Care-Specific and General Consumer Websites.
    Waqas B; Cooley V; Lipner SR
    Cutis; 2021 Apr; 107(4):182-184. PubMed ID: 34096845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient Reviews: Yelp, Google, Healthgrades, Vitals, and RealSelf.
    Furnas HJ; Korman JM; Canales FL; Pence LD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):1419-1431. PubMed ID: 33234982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How wait-times, social media, and surgeon demographics influence online reviews on leading review websites for joint replacement surgeons.
    Damodar D; Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Ingrasci GV; Roche MW; Vakharia RM; Law TY; Hernandez VH
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2019; 10(4):761-767. PubMed ID: 31316251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.