BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38127253)

  • 1. Non-spatial inhibition of return attenuates audiovisual integration owing to modality disparities.
    Wang X; Tang X; Wang A; Zhang M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38127253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.
    Tang X; Gao Y; Yang W; Ren Y; Wu J; Zhang M; Wu Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1093-1107. PubMed ID: 30770958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.
    Tang X; Yuan M; Shi Z; Gao M; Ren R; Wei M; Gao Y
    J Vis; 2022 Mar; 22(4):7. PubMed ID: 35297999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visually Induced Inhibition of Return Affects the Integration of Auditory and Visual Information.
    Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TCW; Spence C
    Perception; 2017 Jan; 46(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 27484341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return.
    Tang X; Wang X; Peng X; Li Q; Zhang C; Wang A; Zhang M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8056. PubMed ID: 33850180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibition of Return Decreases Early Audiovisual Integration: An Event-Related Potential Study.
    Peng X; Tang X; Jiang H; Wang A; Zhang M; Chang R
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():712958. PubMed ID: 34690717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological evidence of crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation affecting inhibition of return.
    Li S; Zhang T; Zu G; Wang A; Zhang M
    Brain Cogn; 2023 Oct; 171():106075. PubMed ID: 37625284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exogenous spatial attention decreases audiovisual integration.
    Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):464-82. PubMed ID: 25341648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Modulation of Exogenous Attention on Emotional Audiovisual Integration.
    Li Y; Li Z; Deng A; Zheng H; Chen J; Ren Y; Yang W
    Iperception; 2021; 12(3):20416695211018714. PubMed ID: 34104384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects of Bilateral and Ipsilateral Auditory Stimuli on the Subcomponents of Visual Attention.
    Fu J; Guo X; Tang X; Wang A; Zhang M; Gao Y; Seno T
    Iperception; 2021 Nov; 12(6):20416695211058222. PubMed ID: 34987747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Being First Matters: Topographical Representational Similarity Analysis of ERP Signals Reveals Separate Networks for Audiovisual Temporal Binding Depending on the Leading Sense.
    Cecere R; Gross J; Willis A; Thut G
    J Neurosci; 2017 May; 37(21):5274-5287. PubMed ID: 28450537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls.
    Lev-Ari T; Zahar Y; Agarwal A; Gutfreund Y
    Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7267. PubMed ID: 32350332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
    Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rewards weaken cross-modal inhibition of return with visual targets.
    Qian Q; Lu M; Sun D; Wang A; Zhang M
    Perception; 2023 Jun; 52(6):400-411. PubMed ID: 37186788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return.
    Spence C; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Jan; 60(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 9503917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of attentional demands on audiovisual integration depends on task-specific components.
    Desmarais G; Schneeberger L; Pearson H; Bubar K; Wilbiks J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2023 Mar; 77(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 36006709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RT Slowing to Valid Cues on a Reflexive Attention Task in Children and Young Adults.
    Lundwall RA; Woodruff J; Tolboe SP
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1324. PubMed ID: 30127758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Top-down attention regulates the neural expression of audiovisual integration.
    Morís Fernández L; Visser M; Ventura-Campos N; Ávila C; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():272-85. PubMed ID: 26119022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deficient inhibition of return for emotional faces in depression.
    Dai Q; Feng Z
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 33(6):921-32. PubMed ID: 19394388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of return and response repetition within and between modalities.
    Roggeveen AB; Prime DJ; Ward LM
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 16049684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.