BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38127330)

  • 1. Pediatric evaluations for deep learning CT denoising.
    Nelson BJ; Kc P; Badal A; Jiang L; Masters SC; Zeng R
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):978-990. PubMed ID: 38127330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of a deep learning-based CT image denoising method: Generalizability over dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness.
    Zeng R; Lin CY; Li Q; Jiang L; Skopec M; Fessler JA; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):836-853. PubMed ID: 34954845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A performance comparison of convolutional neural network-based image denoising methods: The effect of loss functions on low-dose CT images.
    Kim B; Han M; Shim H; Baek J
    Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3906-3923. PubMed ID: 31306488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adapting low-dose CT denoisers for texture preservation using zero-shot local noise-level matching.
    Ko Y; Song S; Baek J; Shim H
    Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4181-4200. PubMed ID: 38478305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm.
    Im JY; Halliburton SS; Mei K; Perkins AE; Wong E; Roshkovan L; Sandvold OF; Liu LP; Gang GJ; Noël PB
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38604190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose reduction and image enhancement in micro-CT using deep learning.
    Muller FM; Maebe J; Vanhove C; Vandenberghe S
    Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5643-5656. PubMed ID: 36994779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iterative image-domain decomposition for dual-energy CT.
    Niu T; Dong X; Petrongolo M; Zhu L
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041901. PubMed ID: 24694132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality evaluation in deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using virtual imaging trial methods: Contrast-dependent spatial resolution.
    Zhou Z; Gong H; Hsieh S; McCollough CH; Yu L
    Med Phys; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38555876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Domain-adaptive denoising network for low-dose CT via noise estimation and transfer learning.
    Wang J; Tang Y; Wu Z; Tsui BMW; Chen W; Yang X; Zheng J; Li M
    Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 50(1):74-88. PubMed ID: 36018732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image denoising by transfer learning of generative adversarial network for dental CT.
    Hegazy MAA; Cho MH; Lee SY
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Sep; 6(5):055024. PubMed ID: 33444255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning low-dose CT degradation from unpaired data with flow-based model.
    Liu X; Liang X; Deng L; Tan S; Xie Y
    Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7516-7530. PubMed ID: 35880375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
    Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An unsupervised two-step training framework for low-dose computed tomography denoising.
    Kim W; Lee J; Choi JH
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1127-1144. PubMed ID: 37432026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-Dose Abdominal CT Using a Deep Learning-Based Denoising Algorithm: A Comparison with CT Reconstructed with Filtered Back Projection or Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
    Shin YJ; Chang W; Ye JC; Kang E; Oh DY; Lee YJ; Park JH; Kim YH
    Korean J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 21(3):356-364. PubMed ID: 32090528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unpaired low-dose computed tomography image denoising using a progressive cyclical convolutional neural network.
    Li Q; Li R; Li S; Wang T; Cheng Y; Zhang S; Wu W; Zhao J; Qiang Y; Wang L
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1289-1312. PubMed ID: 36841936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive nonlocal means filtering based on local noise level for CT denoising.
    Li Z; Yu L; Trzasko JD; Lake DS; Blezek DJ; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Manduca A
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011908. PubMed ID: 24387516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of CT noise reduction performances with deep learning-based, conventional, and combined denoising algorithms.
    Balogh ZA; Janos Kis B
    Med Eng Phys; 2022 Nov; 109():103897. PubMed ID: 36371081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deep learning versus iterative reconstruction on image quality and dose reduction in abdominal CT: a live animal study.
    Zhang JZ; Ganesh H; Raslau FD; Nair R; Escott E; Wang C; Wang G; Zhang J
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jul; 67(14):. PubMed ID: 35709707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A deep learning- and partial least square regression-based model observer for a low-contrast lesion detection task in CT.
    Gong H; Yu L; Leng S; Dilger SK; Ren L; Zhou W; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2052-2063. PubMed ID: 30889282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subjective and objective image quality of low-dose CT images processed using a self-supervised denoising algorithm.
    Kimura Y; Suyama TQ; Shimamura Y; Suzuki J; Watanabe M; Igei H; Otera Y; Kaneko T; Suzukawa M; Matsui H; Kudo H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2024 Jun; 17(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 38413510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.