These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38127547)

  • 1. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):619-633. PubMed ID: 38127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virginia Alford plea-takers experience harsher outcomes than traditional plea-takers.
    Dezember A; Redlich AD
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Aug; 48(4):262-280. PubMed ID: 39325405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psychology of defendant plea decision making.
    Redlich AD; Bibas S; Edkins VA; Madon S
    Am Psychol; 2017; 72(4):339-352. PubMed ID: 28481581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limitations on the Ability to Negotiate Justice: Attorney Perspectives on Guilt, Innocence, and Legal Advice in the Current Plea System.
    Helm RK; Reyna VF; Franz AA; Novick RZ; Dincin S; Cort AE
    Psychol Crime Law; 2018; 24(9):915-934. PubMed ID: 30745792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas.
    Henderson KS; Levett LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Oct; 42(5):427-441. PubMed ID: 30047747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas.
    Redlich AD; Bonventre CL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 25528381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.
    Redlich AD; Domagalski K; Woestehoff SA; Dezember A; Quas JA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):337-352. PubMed ID: 36227319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Innocence in the shadow of COVID-19: Plea decision making during a pandemic.
    Wilford MM; Zimmerman DM; Yan S; Sutherland KT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Dec; 27(4):739-750. PubMed ID: 34138621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing a model of guilty plea decision-making: Fuzzy-trace theory, gist, and categorical boundaries.
    Zottoli TM; Helm RK; Edkins VA; Bixter MT
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 47(3):403-421. PubMed ID: 37326548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alford pleas in the age of innocence.
    Redlich AD; Ozdoğru AA
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):467-88. PubMed ID: 19405036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The paradox of conviction probability: Mock defendants want better deals as risk of conviction increases.
    Bartlett JM; Zottoli TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 33734748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions.
    Redlich AD; Shteynberg RV
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):611-625. PubMed ID: 27348715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals.
    Viljoen JL; Klaver J; Roesch R
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):253-77. PubMed ID: 15965628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The "Partial Innocence" Effect: False Guilty Pleas to Partially Unethical Behaviors.
    Cardenas SA; Sanchez PY; Kassin SM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jul; ():1461672231185639. PubMed ID: 37491946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attorneys' experiences, perceptions, and plea recommendations in child sexual abuse cases.
    Fessinger MB; McAuliff BD; Aronson E; McWilliams K
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Feb; 48(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 38573702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. COVID-19 exacerbates existing system factors that disadvantage defendants: Findings from a national survey of defense attorneys.
    Daftary-Kapur T; Henderson KS; Zottoli TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 34110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negotiating with parents: Attorney practices in the juvenile plea bargain process.
    Fountain EN; Woolard J
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):112-123. PubMed ID: 34110873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guilty pleas of youths and adults: Differences in legal knowledge and decision making.
    Zottoli TM; Daftary-Kapur T
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Apr; 43(2):166-179. PubMed ID: 30570279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.