BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38128762)

  • 21. Thromboplastin calibration revisited to look for possible revision of the World Health Organization recommendations.
    Tripodi A; Scalambrino E; Clerici M; Chantarangkul V; Peyvandi F
    J Thromb Haemost; 2023 Feb; 21(2):311-316. PubMed ID: 36700497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of frozen plasma calibrants for enhanced standardization of the international normalized ratio (INR): a multi-center study.
    Adcock DM; Johnston M
    Thromb Haemost; 2002 Jan; 87(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 11848460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monitoring of treatment with vitamin K antagonists: recombinant thromboplastins are more sensitive to factor VII than tissue-extract thromboplastins.
    Biedermann JS; van den Besselaar AM; de Maat MP; Leebeek FW; Kruip MJ
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):500-506. PubMed ID: 28055147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of STA-NeoPTimal, an extraction thromboplastin reagent with ISI close to 1.
    Carta M; Bonente F; Teresa Comberlato M; Pellizzari T; Marotto E; Marzari E; Giavarina D
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Apr; 43(2):311-317. PubMed ID: 33070473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An international collaborative study on the INR calibration of freeze-dried reference plasmas.
    Hubbard AR; Margetts SM; Weller LJ; Macnab J; Barrowcliffe TW
    Br J Haematol; 1999 Mar; 104(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 10086778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Field study of lyophilized calibrant plasmas for fresh plasma INR determination.
    van den Besselaar AM; Houbouyan-Réveillard LL
    Thromb Haemost; 2002 Feb; 87(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 11859852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Biological monitoring of treatment with antivitamin K. Value of INR and definition of new therapeutic ranges. A study of 73 patients].
    Gouin I; Horellou MH; Conard J; Samama M
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Mar; 83(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 2108630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Thromboplastin standards.
    van den Besselaar AM; Chantarangkul V; Tripodi A
    Biologicals; 2010 Jul; 38(4):430-6. PubMed ID: 20338779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Harmonization and Standardization: Where Are We Now?
    Miller WG; Greenberg N
    J Appl Lab Med; 2021 Mar; 6(2):510-521. PubMed ID: 33241270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimizing the Verification of Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (MNPT) and International Sensitivity Index (ISI) for Accurate Conversion of Prothrombin Time (PT) to International Normalized Ratio (INR).
    Favaloro EJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1646():59-74. PubMed ID: 28804818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Poor agreement among prothrombin time international normalized ratio methods: comparison of seven commercial reagents.
    Horsti J; Uppa H; Vilpo JA
    Clin Chem; 2005 Mar; 51(3):553-60. PubMed ID: 15665046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Standardization of Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR).
    Dorgalaleh A; Favaloro EJ; Bahraini M; Rad F
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Feb; 43(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 32979036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Standardization of the INR: how good is your laboratory's INR and can it be improved?
    Favaloro EJ; Adcock DM
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2008 Oct; 34(7):593-603. PubMed ID: 19085760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Calibration verification of the International Normalized Ratio.
    Critchfield GC; Bennett ST; Swaim WR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Dec; 106(6):786-94. PubMed ID: 8980356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving the inter-laboratory harmonization of the international normalized ratio (INR): utilizing the concept of transference to estimate and/or validate international sensitivity index (ISI) and mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) values and/or to eliminate measurement bias.
    Favaloro EJ; McVicker W; Zhang Y; Hamdam S; Huynh M; Peris P; O'Neal M; Hocker N
    Clin Lab Sci; 2012; 25(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 22458045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of thromboplastins using the ISI and INR system.
    Moriarty HT; Lam-Po-Tang PR; Anastas N
    Pathology; 1990 Apr; 22(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 2235100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Suggestions and propositions to resolve some issues for standardization of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time].
    Kagawa K; Fukutake K
    Rinsho Byori; 1999 May; 47(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 10375964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An International Sensitivity Index (ISI) derived from patients with abnormal liver function improves agreement between INRs determined with different reagents.
    Sermon AM; Smith JM; Maclean R; Kitchen S
    Thromb Haemost; 2010 Apr; 103(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 20174759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of some instruments for prothrombin time testing on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of two rabbit tissue thromboplastin reagents.
    Poggio M; van den Besselaar AM; van der Velde EA; Bertina RM
    Thromb Haemost; 1989 Nov; 62(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 2595661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of INRs determined with a whole blood prothrombin time device and two international reference preparations for thromboplastin.
    van den Besselaar AM
    Thromb Haemost; 2000 Sep; 84(3):410-2. PubMed ID: 11019963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.