171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38130700)
1. Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Implant Crown Materials on Implant Components and Bone Stress Distribution: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Nokar K; Atri F; Nokar S
Int J Dent; 2023; 2023():1896475. PubMed ID: 38130700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.
Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P
J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.
Deste Gökay G; Oyar P; Gökçimen G; Durkan R
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):545. PubMed ID: 38730391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical behavior of different designs of hybrid abutment-restoration on the posterior crown: a finite element analysis.
Rocha AA; Carvalho MA; Bordin D; Cury AADB; Lazari-Carvalho PC
Braz Dent J; 2023; 34(6):140-149. PubMed ID: 38133088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Different Customized Abutment Types on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Single Crown: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Pumnil S; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Elsaka S
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):e2-e11. PubMed ID: 35505638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress analysis in implant, abutment, and peripheral bone with different restorative crown and abutment materials: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Rani S; Jain N; Barua SL; Idnani S; Kaushik N
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():62. PubMed ID: 37388301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of Ceramic Materials on Biomechanical Behavior of Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis with Hybrid Abutment.
Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Özcan M; Borges ALS; Bottino MA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 31046208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study.
Sevimay M; Usumez A; Eskitascioglu G
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Apr; 73(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 15742379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.
Pitta J; Hjerppe J; Burkhardt F; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Feb; 32(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33258267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of crown stiffness and prosthetic screw absence on the stress distribution in implant-supported restoration: A 3D finite element analysis.
Epifania E; di Lauro AE; Ausiello P; Mancone A; Garcia-Godoy F; Mendes Tribst JP
PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285421. PubMed ID: 37146083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Stresses Generated within the Supporting Structures of Mandibular Second Molars Restored with Different Crown Materials: 3-D Finite Element Analysis (FEA).
Abuelenain DA; Ajaj R; El-Bab EI; Hammouda MM
J Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 24(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 25521774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations.
Roberts EE; Bailey CW; Ashcraft-Olmscheid DL; Vandewalle KS
J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):644-650. PubMed ID: 29417647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Stress in an implant-supported unitary fixed partial prosthesis with different materials in the first lower premolar through finite elements].
Mendez A; Coronado H
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2023; 11(1):e140. PubMed ID: 38288318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Stress Distribution and Deformation of Four Prosthetic Materials in Full-mouth Rehabilitation with Implants: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study.
Chand YB; Mahendra J; Jigeesh N; Mahendra L; Shivasubramanian L; Perika SB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 33850065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
