These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3813117)
1. Clinical experience with a new rate-responsive TX pacemaker. Yasuno M; Nishino Y; Nishino M; Akashi T; Tanahashi H; Kobayashi K; Yamada Y; Inoue M Angiology; 1986 Dec; 37(12 Pt 1):888-95. PubMed ID: 3813117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing. Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence. Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life]. Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Experience with VVI, QT time and activity-controlled pacemaker systems in patients with tranvenous ablation of atrioventricular conduction]. Trappe HJ; Klein H; Frank G; Lichtlen P Z Kardiol; 1986 Dec; 75(12):737-43. PubMed ID: 3825223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Use of a rate responsive pacemaker in sick sinus syndrome]. Ito T; Nishino M; Nakagawa T; Okada T; Hasegawa S; Kuryu T; Ebisuno S; Ohnishi S; Tanahashi H; Yasuno M Kokyu To Junkan; 1993 Jan; 41(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8434162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Chronic frequency-adaptive pacemaker therapy in patients with heart failure]. Haltern G; Kempa L; Ochs JG; Hanrath P; Sigmund M Z Kardiol; 1995 Oct; 84(10):834-43. PubMed ID: 7502571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation by DDD stimulation]. Fröhlig G; Sen S; Rettig G; Schieffer H; Bette L Z Kardiol; 1985 Sep; 74(9):537-47. PubMed ID: 4060830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cardiopulmonary stress: control of the function of frequency variable pacemaker systems]. Treese N; Coutinho M; Ophoff N; Rhein S; Pop T; Meyer J Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 2378157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate-responsive pacing: clinical experience. Goicolea de Oro A; Ayza MW; de la Llana R; Alvarez Morales J; Gutiérrez Díez JR; González Alvarez J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1985 May; 8(3 Pt 1):322-8. PubMed ID: 2582377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience with activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing. A study based upon assessment of exercise tolerance. Kaul U; Sundar AS; Bhatia ML J Assoc Physicians India; 1989 May; 37(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 2613638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do we need a reflex tachycardia to stand up? Fortrat JO; Lemarie C; Bellard E; Victor J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 28(9):962-7. PubMed ID: 16176536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical experiences with 3 different rate-adaptive pacemaker systems]. Maisch B; Langenfeld H; Steilner H Z Kardiol; 1986 Aug; 75(8):480-8. PubMed ID: 3776287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of heart rate on the working capacity of patients with complete heart block and physiological pacemaker. Lukl J; Heinc P Cor Vasa; 1991; 33(6):506-13. PubMed ID: 1842943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ergospirometric findings in respiration- and QT-controlled pacemakers]. Sigmund M; van Erckelens F; Reupcke C; Heiermann B; Hanrath P Z Kardiol; 1994; 83 Suppl 3():145-8. PubMed ID: 7941662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing]. Lelakowski J; Majewski J; Bednarek J; Szczepkowski J; Machejek J Przegl Lek; 2001; 58(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11475854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR]. Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test]. Chabernaud JM; Guéret P; Blanc P; Bavoux O; Bensaid J Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Jan; 86(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8338403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of the evoked response in determining the paced ventricular rate and performance of the QT or rate responsive (TX) pacemaker. Fananapazir L; Rademaker M; Bennett DH Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1985 Sep; 8(5):701-14. PubMed ID: 2414752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]