BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38132390)

  • 21. Pelvic nodal CTV from L4-L5 or aortic bifurcation? An audit of the patterns of regional failures in cervical cancer patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy.
    Rai B; Bansal A; Patel F; Gulia A; Kapoor R; Sharma SC
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2014 Oct; 44(10):941-7. PubMed ID: 25104792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Escalated radiation and prophylactic extended field nodal irradiation are beneficial for FIGO IIIB cervical cancer patients' prognosis.
    Meng Q; Wang W; Liu X; Hou X; Lian X; Sun S; Yan J; Liu Z; Miao Z; Hu K; Zhang F
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Nov; 13(1):223. PubMed ID: 30453993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Whether individualized dose escalation should be recommended for lymph nodes with different sizes in the definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer?
    Lv X; Rao H; Feng T; Wu C; Lou H
    Radiat Oncol; 2022 Oct; 17(1):167. PubMed ID: 36266716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of radiation doses to the para-aortic, pelvic, and inguinal lymph nodes delivered by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Mohamed SM; Aagaard T; Fokdal LU; Pedersen EM; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 25176182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Extended field intensity modulated radiation therapy with concomitant boost for lymph node-positive cervical cancer: analysis of regional control and recurrence patterns in the positron emission tomography/computed tomography era.
    Vargo JA; Kim H; Choi S; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Kelley JL; Edwards RP; Comerci JT; Beriwal S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1091-8. PubMed ID: 25303889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
    Aslan K; Meydanli MM; Oz M; Tohma YA; Haberal A; Ayhan A
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):e1. PubMed ID: 31788991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anatomic distribution of fluorodeoxyglucose-avid para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer.
    Takiar V; Fontanilla HP; Eifel PJ; Jhingran A; Kelly P; Iyer RB; Levenback CF; Zhang Y; Dong L; Klopp A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(4):1045-50. PubMed ID: 23332221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nodal failure after chemo-radiation and MRI guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer: Patterns of failure in the EMBRACE study cohort.
    Nomden CN; Pötter R; de Leeuw AAC; Tanderup K; Lindegaard JC; Schmid MP; Fortin I; Haie-Meder C; Mahantshetty U; Hoskin P; Segedin B; Bruheim K; Rai B; Huang F; Cooper R; Van Der Steen Banasik E; Van Limbergen E; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM;
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 May; 134():185-190. PubMed ID: 31005214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
    Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
    Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prognostic factors in definitive radiotherapy of uterine cervical cancer.
    Yalman D; Aras AB; Ozkök S; Duransoy A; Celik OK; Ozsaran Z; Haydaroğlu A
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(3-4):309-14. PubMed ID: 12807246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. External beam boost irradiation for clinically positive pelvic nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer.
    Ariga T; Toita T; Kasuya G; Nagai Y; Inamine M; Kudaka W; Kakinohana Y; Aoki Y; Murayama S
    J Radiat Res; 2013 Jul; 54(4):690-6. PubMed ID: 23365264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Topographic distribution of lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer: an analysis of 8314 lymph nodes.
    Cai J; He X; Wang H; Dong W; Zhang Y; Zhao J; Willborn KC; Huang B; Wang Z; Jiang P
    Radiat Oncol; 2021 Mar; 16(1):54. PubMed ID: 33743714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Para-aortic node sampling in small (3-cm or less) stage IB invasive cervical cancer.
    Patsner B; Sedlacek TV; Lovecchio JL
    Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Jan; 44(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 1730426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of radiation dose and standardized uptake value of (18)FDG PET on nodal control in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Ramlov A; Kroon PS; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; De Leeuw AA; Gormsen LC; Fokdal LU; Tanderup K; Lindegaard JC
    Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26271799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical outcomes after isolated pelvic failure in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiation.
    Lin AJ; Ma S; Markovina S; Schwarz J; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Grigsby PW
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jun; 153(3):530-534. PubMed ID: 30905434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma treated by surgical intent: the role of para-aortic lymph node dissection.
    Lea JS; Sheets EE; Duska LR; Miller DS; Schorge JO
    Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Feb; 84(2):285-8. PubMed ID: 11812088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Early clinical outcome of coverage probability based treatment planning for simultaneous integrated boost of nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Lindegaard JC; Assenholt M; Ramlov A; Fokdal LU; Alber M; Tanderup K
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1479-1486. PubMed ID: 28849684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Outcome of cervical carcinoma with locoregional lymph node involvement by FDG-PET].
    Paumier A; Blanchard P; Mazeron R; Dumas I; Morice P; Lhomme C; Leboulleux S; Haie-Meder C
    Cancer Radiother; 2012 May; 16(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 22387194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in FIGO stage IA2-IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Revisiting the role of surgical assessment.
    Del Carmen MG; Pareja R; Melamed A; Rodriguez J; Greer A; Clark RM; Rice LW
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):406-411. PubMed ID: 30017539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prognostic Value of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Treatment in High-Risk Cervical Cancer.
    Kwon J; Eom KY; Kim IA; Kim JS; Kim YB; No JH; Kim K
    Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 48(2):632-40. PubMed ID: 26194370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.