171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38132811)
1. Biomechanical Analysis of Axial Gradient Porous Dental Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Zhang C; Wang Y
J Funct Biomater; 2023 Nov; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 38132811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structural Design and Finite Element Simulation Analysis of Grade 3 Graded Porous Titanium Implant.
Liu B; Xu W; Chen M; Chen D; Sun G; Zhang C; Pan Y; Lu J; Guo E; Lu X
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 36077485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel Design and Finite Element Analysis of Diamond-like Porous Implants with Low Stiffness.
Zhang J; Zhang X; Chen Y; Feng W; Chen X
Materials (Basel); 2021 Nov; 14(22):. PubMed ID: 34832321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous structure design and mechanical behavior analysis based on TPMS for customized root analogue implant.
Song K; Wang Z; Lan J; Ma S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104222. PubMed ID: 33310682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric Design of Hip Implant With Gradient Porous Structure.
Gao X; Zhao Y; Wang M; Liu Z; Liu C
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():850184. PubMed ID: 35651549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical response at peri-implant mandibular bone for variation of pore characteristics of implants: A Finite Element Study.
Sarkar S; Sahu TP; Datta A; Chandra N; Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Chowdhury AR
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 31741483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Porous Microstructures on the Biomechanical Characteristics of a Root Analogue Implant: An Animal Study and a Finite Element Analysis.
Liu T; Chen Y; Apicella A; Mu Z; Yu T; Huang Y; Wang C
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2020 Nov; 6(11):6356-6367. PubMed ID: 33449664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment-A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Raaj G; Manimaran P; Kumar CD; Sadan DS; Abirami M
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2019 May; 11(Suppl 2):S347-S354. PubMed ID: 31198367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Integration Patterns Around Implant Neck on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bone: A Finite Element Analysis.
Han J; Sun Y; Wang C
J Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 26(6):549-558. PubMed ID: 26799928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].
Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of diameter, length and elastic modulus of a dental implant on stress and strain levels in peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis.
Robau-Porrua A; Pérez-Rodríguez Y; Soris-Rodríguez LM; Pérez-Acosta O; González JE
Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 30(5-6):541-558. PubMed ID: 31903978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel adaptive finite element algorithms to predict bone ingrowth in additive manufactured porous implants.
Cheong VS; Fromme P; Mumith A; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():230-239. PubMed ID: 30086415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Studies on the Performance of Molar Porous Root-Analogue Implant by Finite Element Model Simulation and Verification of a Case Report.
Guo F; Hu M; Wang C; Huang S; Lou M; Liu C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 78(11):1965.e1-1965.e9. PubMed ID: 32628934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
