175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38132811)
21. Novel adaptive finite element algorithms to predict bone ingrowth in additive manufactured porous implants.
Cheong VS; Fromme P; Mumith A; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():230-239. PubMed ID: 30086415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Studies on the Performance of Molar Porous Root-Analogue Implant by Finite Element Model Simulation and Verification of a Case Report.
Guo F; Hu M; Wang C; Huang S; Lou M; Liu C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 78(11):1965.e1-1965.e9. PubMed ID: 32628934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical Analysis of Functionally Graded Root Analog Implants on Alveolar Bone: A 3D Finite Element Study.
Wang F; Jiang Z; Si P; Lan J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(4):e63-e71. PubMed ID: 34411208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of finite element results with photoelastic stress analysis around dental implants with different threads.
Geramizadeh M; Katoozian H; Amid R; Kadkhodazadeh M
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 30152630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimization of stress distribution of bone-implant interface (BII).
Zhang C; Zeng C; Wang Z; Zeng T; Wang Y
Biomater Adv; 2023 Apr; 147():213342. PubMed ID: 36841109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stress-dependent design and optimization methodology of gradient porous implant and application in femoral stem.
Sun C; Kang J; Wang L; Jin Z; Liu C; Li D
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Sep; 26(11):1308-1319. PubMed ID: 36036151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load.
Uppalapati V; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Bhat I; Munaganti J; Khan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 37189007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates.
Yang Y; Liu Y; Yuan X; Ren M; Chen X; Luo L; Zheng L; Liu Y
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):220. PubMed ID: 37061667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preparation and mechanical properties analysis of porous structure for bone tissue engineering.
Cui J; Yi Y; Zhang J; Chai L; Jin H
Biomed Mater Eng; 2022; 33(6):465-476. PubMed ID: 35662101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Finite element and experimental analysis to select patient's bone condition specific porous dental implant, fabricated using additive manufacturing.
Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Mondal SC; Roychowdhury A
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103839. PubMed ID: 32763517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Finite element analysis of crestal bone loss around porous-coated dental implants.
Vaillancourt H; Pilliar RM; McCammond D
J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):267-82. PubMed ID: 8589512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implant biomechanics in grafted sinus: a finite element analysis.
Fanuscu MI; Vu HV; Poncelet B
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 15119454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stress analysis in bone tissue around single implants with different diameters and veneering materials: a 3-D finite element study.
Santiago Junior JF; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; de Carvalho PS
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Dec; 33(8):4700-14. PubMed ID: 24094178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Study of cellular femoral stem for stress shielding and interface stability.
Rahmat N; Kadkhodapour J; Arbabtafti M
Int J Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 46(6):370-377. PubMed ID: 37070137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative study of stress characteristics in surrounding bone during insertion of dental implants of three different thread designs: A three-dimensional dynamic finite element study.
Udomsawat C; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Khongkhunthian P
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Feb; 5(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 30847230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis.
Yazicioglu D; Bayram B; Oguz Y; Cinar D; Uckan S
J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 26867093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
