175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38132811)
41. Biomechanical analysis of printable functionally graded material (FGM) dental implants for different bone densities.
Ouldyerou A; Mehboob H; Merdji A; Aminallah L; Mehboob A; Mukdadi OM
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Nov; 150():106111. PubMed ID: 36195043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Design of a Novel Trabecular Acetabular Cup and Selective Laser Melting Fabrication.
Wang C; Sun B; Zhang Y; Wang C; Yang G
Materials (Basel); 2022 Sep; 15(17):. PubMed ID: 36079522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Biomechanical effect of crestal bone osteoplasty before implant placement: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Hudieb M; Kasugai S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 21131179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Partial Bone Formation in Additive Manufactured Porous Implants Reduces Predicted Stress and Danger of Fatigue Failure.
Cheong VS; Fromme P; Coathup MJ; Mumith A; Blunn GW
Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 48(1):502-514. PubMed ID: 31549330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Influence of Implant Surface Topography and Loading Condition on Stress Distribution in Bone Around Implants: A Comparative 3D FEA.
Savadi RC; Agarwal J; Agarwal RS; Rangarajan V
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2011 Dec; 11(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 23204731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of the effects of different implant apical designs on the magnitude and distribution of stress and strain in bone: a finite element analysis study.
Kadkhodazadeh M; Lafzi A; Raoofi S; Khademi M; Amid R; Movahhedy MR; Torabi H
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2014; 24(2-3):109-19. PubMed ID: 25272209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Mechanical properties and osteoblast proliferation of complex porous dental implants filled with magnesium alloy based on 3D printing.
Zhang X; Mao J; Zhou Y; Ji F; Chen X
J Biomater Appl; 2021 May; 35(10):1275-1283. PubMed ID: 32915665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Oliveira H; Brizuela Velasco A; Ríos-Santos JV; Sánchez Lasheras F; Lemos BF; Gil FJ; Carvalho A; Herrero-Climent M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(13):. PubMed ID: 32630294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Bionic mechanical design and 3D printing of novel porous Ti6Al4V implants for biomedical applications.
Peng WM; Liu YF; Jiang XF; Dong XT; Jun J; Baur DA; Xu JJ; Pan H; Xu X
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2019 Aug.; 20(8):647-659. PubMed ID: 31273962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. Part II: biomechanical integrity at bone-implant interface.
Shibata Y; Tanimoto Y; Maruyama N; Nagakura M
J Prosthodont Res; 2015 Apr; 59(2):84-95. PubMed ID: 25797023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis.
Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of specific retention biomaterials for ball attachment on the biomechanical response of single implant-supported overdenture: A finite element analysis.
Gibreel M; Sameh A; Hegazy S; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK; Perea-Lowery L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Oct; 122():104653. PubMed ID: 34229172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A 3-D Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution on Implant-supported Fixed Prosthesis with Four Different Commercially Available Implant Systems.
Tyagi R; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Malethia A; Saini N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):835-840. PubMed ID: 33568601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel porous-structure implant: finite element study.
Inglam S; Chantarapanich N; Suebnukarn S; Vatanapatimakul N; Sucharitpwatskul S; Sitthiseripratip K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e48-56. PubMed ID: 23527368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
